As usual, Bill O’Reilly has it all wrong.
On last Monday’s episode of The O’Reilly Factor, O’Reilly gave his take on Hillary Clinton running for president and the competition she faces.
O’Reilly proclaimed that,
“If you’re a Christian or a white man in America, it’s open season on you. Therefore, Hillary Clinton has an advantage. She can run a general campaign: ‘First woman in the White House, and I’m gonna help you by increasing the entitlement society.’ It will take a very articulate and tough-minded Republican to defeat her.”
That’s right. According to Bill-O, in addition to the never-ending war on Christianity that he loves to go on about, there’s also a war on white men being waged across our country.
Now, Bill O’Reilly has said many unbelievable things during his career as a talking head, but this one might just take the cake.
That’s because white privilege and male privilege are alive and well in the US today.
See more news and opinion from Thom Hartmann at Truthout here.
In her 1990 essay, “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Backpack,” Peggy McIntosh writes that,
“I think whites are carefully taught not to recognize white privilege, as males are taught not to recognize male privilege. So I have begun in an untutored way to ask what it is like to have white privilege. I have come to see white privilege as an invisible package of unearned assets which I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was ‘meant’ to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an invisible weightless backpack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools and blank checks.”
McIntosh goes on to lay out a white privilege litmus test of sorts. If O’Reilly or any white male in the US took that test, they would see that the idea of an “open season” on white men is completely bogus.
But more importantly, they would see that white privilege is very, very real.
For example, if a white man wants to move, he can pretty much rent or purchase a home anywhere he can afford and would want to live. Many Americans can’t say that.
If a white man in the US wants to go buy a new TV, he can go to the store and shop around without being hassled, followed or marked as a potential shoplifter. Many Americans can’t say that either.
If a white man gets pulled over by a cop, chances are pretty good that he didn’t get pulled over because of his race. Again, many Americans can’t say that.
And, if a white man gets hired for a job, he believes that he was hired because he was the best fit for that job, and that race had nothing to do with it. You guessed it; many Americans can’t say that.
But it’s not just all about white privilege. White men in the US also have the benefit of male privilege.
For example, white men can expect to be paid accordingly for the work that they do. Their gender isn’t going to affect their pay.
White men can be promoted within a company, without rumors swirling that they “slept their way to the top.”
White men can interrupt, pontificate and argue without ever worrying about being called “uppity” – instead, they’re called “assertive” and “strong.”
And, white men can balance their professional and home lives, without being called selfish and uncaring.
So, when Bill O’Reilly says that it’s “open season” on white men in this country, he’s either mind-numbingly ignorant or just not taking a good hard look at our society today.
That’s the bad news. The good news is that the presidency of Barack Obama has brought out the issue of white privilege and the candidacy of Hillary Clinton will bring male privilege and misogyny to the front of the news. And those are conversations and lessons that we all need.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.