President-elect Joe Biden has reportedly decided to nominate retired Army Gen. Lloyd Austin — currently a member of Raytheon’s board of directors — to serve as Pentagon chief, a move that comes after initial frontrunner Michèle Flournoy faced mounting opposition from progressive anti-war organizations and activists.
Biden’s rejection of Flournoy — a hawk and Booz Allen Hamilton board member — was viewed as a positive by some progressive groups, but the reported nomination of Austin was hardly welcomed with open arms.
“Tremendous gratitude to the over 2,500 individuals who took action and contacted the Senate to block Flournoy’s appointment,” CodePink, part of a coalition of anti-war organizations that mobilized against Flournoy, said late Monday. “Get ready, Gen. Austin, we’re coming for you.”
Danielle Brian, executive director of watchdog group Project on Government Oversight, tweeted that Biden’s selection of Austin — who served as head of the U.S. Central Command during the Obama administration — spells “bad news for civilian control [of the armed forces] and any real distance from the military-industrial complex.”
Others similarly raised alarm about the selection of another retired general, particularly one with close ties to the weapons industry, to lead the Department of Defense amid a growing push by the Democratic Party’s left flank to cut the Pentagon’s budget and bring U.S. wars overseas to an end. According to Politico, “Biden’s transition team has appointed at least four retired generals or admirals and a former top enlisted Marine.”
While the president-elect has vowed to suspend arms sales to Saudi Arabia and end U.S. support for the kingdom’s catastrophic assault on Yemen, “the person Biden has reportedly picked to lead the Department of Defense is on the board of Raytheon, a key supplier of bombs to the U.S.-Saudi war in Yemen that has lobbied aggressively in opposition to curbs on arms sales to the Saudi-led coalition,” noted In These Times reporter Sarah Lazare.
The civil-military divide is ever growing and a life career military general overseeing the Department of War (DoD) won’t help.
Corrupt corporate profiteering by defense leaders has kept this country mindlessly funding endless war 🦠💣
Terrible and telling, #BidenHarris. https://t.co/LGaIRXSPUw
— Vets for the People (@VetsforthePpl) December 8, 2020
Because he has been retired from the military for fewer than seven years, Austin — like President Donald Trump’s former Defense Secretary, retired Gen. Jim Mattis — must receive a congressional waiver to serve as head of the Pentagon.
“Mattis received a waiver with an 81-to-17 vote in the Senate and a 268-to-151 vote in the House, but the majority of those opposing him were Democrats or caucus with them,” the Washington Post reported Monday night. “They included Sens. Tammy Duckworth (Ill.), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Cory Booker (N.J.), and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).”
Jon Rainwater, executive director of advocacy group Peace Action, said Monday that Austin’s current role on the board of Raytheon — one of the largest military contractors in the world — is no mere “side issue” given the company’s stake in ongoing overseas conflicts.
“Biden will quickly face calls to block arms sales to the [United Arab Emirates] that include Raytheon missiles,” noted Rainwater, who said Congress must press Austin on such arms sales during his confirmation hearings.
“The revolving door between Pentagon and industry can easily impact policy,” Rainwater added. “We have here a double whammy: 1) Concerns about generals instead of civilians in charge and, 2) Working for a mega-contractor who benefits from some policies and whose profits are threatened by others.”
Last month, as Common Dreams reported, Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) sent a letter urging Biden to pick a defense secretary without connections to the military-industrial complex, a demand that Peace Action said “should be basic common sense.”
“American national security should not be defined by the bottom lines of Boeing, General Dynamics, and Raytheon,” Pocan said in a statement at the time. “Instead of draining the swamp, Donald Trump ensured that his Pentagon lined the pockets of America’s most profitable defense contractors. President-elect Joe Biden has an opportunity to take profits out of policy and build back better. The American people deserve a defense secretary that puts the American people’s safety above corporate profits.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.