In a recent interview with Spanish-language cable network Univision that aired on Tuesday, President Joe Biden suggested that he would soon issue an executive order using the same authority former President Donald Trump used to enact racist immigration policies.
Lamenting that thousands of migrants are seeking asylum in the U.S. daily under current policy, Biden said during the interview that he would use his authority as laid out in Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit the number of migrants who can enter the country. Under that statute, presidents are allowed to block certain people from immigrating if they’re deemed “detrimental” by the chief executive to U.S. interests.
According to reporting from Axios, the action Biden is considering would be “Trump-like,” and could come as soon as the end of this month. Trump frequently used that section to push his racist immigration policies, including targeted bans on Muslims and Latinx immigrants.
Notably, Biden has admitted that he might not have the legal authority to issue such a sweeping command without a legitimate reason to do so.
“We’re examining whether or not I have that power,” Biden said.
In other comments during the interview, Biden suggested he might issue an executive order regardless of whether or not his aides believe it’s legal.
“Some are suggesting that I should just go ahead and try it. And if I get shut down by the court, I get shut down by the court,” he said.
There’s a strong likelihood that Biden is seeking to enact inhumane immigration restrictions in response to right-wing attacks against him during a presidential election year, even as polling indicates that voters want a humanitarian approach to the issue. Indeed, a PBS NewsHour poll from February found that more respondents (25 percent) said the top priority for the U.S. on immigration should be taking in refugees who are trying to escape violence and war, while a smaller but similar proportion (23 percent) said the top priority should be increasing security to deter crossings. (The plurality of respondents, 44 percent, said the top priority should be ensuring immigrants who came to the country as children are able to remain in the U.S. and become citizens.)
Critics blasted the Biden administration for its willingness to enact right-wing immigration policies using the same justifications that Trump did during his tenure.
“As I’ve repeatedly explained, including to Congress, any 212(f) proclamation used at the border would be (1) completely useless as a practical matter given the ways in which 212(f) works and (2) almost certainly unlawful and likely to be struck down in court, as Trump’s was,” Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director for the American Immigration Council, said in a post on X reacting to Biden’s comments.
Silky Shah, Executive Director of Detention Watch Network, an organization dedicated to ending immigration detention, also excoriated Biden’s comments.
“Biden continues to send a clear and dangerous message that he sees immigrant and refugee lives as expendable by enacting a racist and immoral agenda on immigration,” Shah said in a statement to Truthout. “Despite his numerous promises to establish a ‘fair and humane’ immigration system, Biden is rapidly moving to the right on immigration.”
“It’s true, we need a dramatic step” when it comes to immigration, Shah said. But that step should be toward welcoming “all immigrants with dignity and respect, including people seeking asylum.”
“Instead, Biden continues to move in the wrong direction, playing political games with people’s lives,” Shah concluded. “We join immigrants and communities across the country in condemning Biden for continuing to treat immigrants as expendable and legitimizing the far-right’s fear mongering and racist agenda.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.