A federal judge in Arkansas has struck down the state’s ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, writing that it is unequivocally unconstitutional.
Judge James Moody delivered his opinion on Tuesday, ruling that the regulation, which was passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature in 2021, unlawfully bars access to effective medical treatments for transgender and nonbinary children in the state. The law also infringes upon the constitutionally protected speech rights of doctors, who are barred under the law from discussing options with patients or their families regarding where they can seek the treatment they need, Moody said.
The case has been watched closely, as it was the first to challenge a state’s ban on gender-affirming care for trans youth.
Act 626 of 2021 was called by its opponents the “Save Adolescents from Experimentation Act” — a grossly misleading and transphobic title, as the type of care it bars is not experimental but rather consists of carefully studied treatment options that have been proven to be effective. The law was the first in the country to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth.
Although the ruling only applies to the Arkansas law, it will likely be cited in cases throughout the country where lawsuits against similar bans have been filed. In addition to Arkansas, 19 states have passed bans on gender-affirming care, though several of those bans are currently blocked by preliminary injunctions.
Moody’s ruling is the first such judgment to find bans of this type unconstitutional.
Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) said that the state intends to appeal the ruling. But legal experts say this will be difficult to pull off because the ruling demonstrates that the state did not have a compelling reason to ban gender-affirming care for young trans residents.
“[Moody’s] findings of fact issued Tuesday could be the most important aspect of his decision,” legal analyst Chris Geidner said on his Substack account. “Because trial judges are able to review the evidence and are closest to the case at trial, their findings of fact are accepted on appeal unless the appeals court finds that those findings constitute a ‘clear error,’ a deferential standard.”
Notably, the state called upon so-called experts who didn’t actually have the necessary qualifications to discuss gender-affirming care. One supposed expert, a doctor, had never even “treated a patient for gender dysphoria,” Moody pointed out.
Ultimately, the state’s arguments for why it should be allowed to deny medical care to transgender youth failed to hold up in the face of actual evidence that the plaintiffs presented, Moody said.
“Rather than protecting children or safeguarding medical ethics, the evidence showed that the prohibited medical care improves the mental health and well-being of patients and that by prohibiting it, the state undermined the interests it claims to be advancing,” the judge wrote in his order.
Citing the Equal Protection Clause of 14th Amendment, Moody noted that parents “have a fundamental right to seek medical care for their children and, in conjunction with their adolescent child’s consent and their doctor’s recommendation, make a judgment that medical care is necessary.”
The act also violated the First Amendment speech rights of doctors, Moody wrote, limiting their ability to inform patients where gender-affirming care treatments may be available for them.
Chase Strangio, a transgender rights advocate and an attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union who represented the families in the case seeking to have the law overturned, celebrated the ruling.
“This victory shows that these laws, when tested by evidence, are indefensible under any standard of constitutional review,” Strangio, who himself has benefited from gender-affirming care, said in a statement. “We hope that this sends a message to other states about the vulnerability of these laws and the many harms that come from passing them.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy