Progressive lawmakers are ripping into President Joe Biden over reports that he is considering using the same authority that Donald Trump invoked to establish his hateful Muslim Ban in order to enact sweeping bans on asylum at the southern border.
Multiple outlets are reporting that administration insiders say Biden is preparing to use his executive power to severely restrict immigration through a potential plan to bar asylum seekers from being able to be granted asylum if they enter the U.S. illegally. This would overturn long standing policies that allow immigrants to be granted protections upon entering the U.S., and could be disastrous for immigrants’ and asylum seekers’ rights.
“Doing Trump impressions isn’t how we beat Trump,” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) on social media Wednesday. “Seeking asylum is a legal right of all people. In the face of authoritarian threat, we should not buckle on our principles — we should commit to them. The mere suggestion is outrageous and the President should refuse to sign it.”
Immigration advocates have said that Biden’s immigration policies have often echoed Trump’s or are virtually identical — and in some cases, the Biden administration has taken inhumane policies like immigrant concentration camps and expulsions of immigrants further than Trump did. The new plan, if implemented, would be another in a string of anti-immigration decisions, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington) said.
“This would be an extremely disappointing mistake. Cruel enforcement-only policies have been tried for 30 years and simply do not work,” Jayapal wrote. “Democrats cannot continue to take pages out of Donald Trump and Stephen Miller’s playbook — we need to lead with dignity and humanity.”
The Biden administration’s plans are reportedly focused around Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which gives presidents authority to restrict the entry of asylum seekers if they are deemed “detrimental” to U.S. interests.
Trump had used 212(f) to bar travelers to the U.S. from countries with Muslim-majority populations, an openly Islamophobic policy that experts said was a flagrant violation of international humanitarian and asylum law. Various versions of the ban were in place for years until Biden revoked it on his first day in office in 2021.
Some experts have cast doubt on the ability of the Biden administration to implement a ban under 212(f), saying that this is an issue that has already been litigated and decided.
“President Biden has broad powers under the immigration statute, but they are not unlimited. Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act allows a president to suspend the entry of noncitizens who are ‘detrimental to the interests of the United States,’ but that doesn’t mean he can just shut the border to everyone,” said Cornell immigration law professor Stephen Yale-Loehr to CNN.
Still, a lack of legal authority may not be enough to stop the immigration policy from being implemented, especially with an ultra-conservative Supreme Court. Trump’s Muslim Ban had been struck down multiple times by lower courts saying that using 212(f) for his purposes were unconstitutional, but the Supreme Court ultimately upheld a version of the ban in 2018, which Trump then used to drastically expand his restrictive measures.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.