The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Kansas, representing five transgender Kansans who want to get or keep a driver’s license that matches their gender identity, filed a motion to intervene in a lawsuit between Attorney General Kris Kobach (R) and the Kansas Department of Revenue.
“Mr. Kobach’s actions demonstrate a flagrant attempt to do an end-run around our state constitution,” said Sharon Brett, legal director of the ACLU of Kansas.
On July 1, SB 180, a law that restricts the definition of sex in order to limit transgender rights in the state, went into effect. While the right to change gender makers on birth certificates was confirmed in 2018, Kobach’s office has asked the federal court to nullify the consent agreement in this case since the passing of SB 180 and has advised that the anti-trans law would revert driver’s licenses and birth certificates of some Kansans back to the genders they were assigned at birth.
Lambda Legal Counsel and Health Care Strategist Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, who served as lead counsel in Foster v. Andersen – Lambda Legal’s challenge to Kansas’s previous discriminatory birth certificate policy – which resulted in the consent agreement, responded in a statement saying, “Today’s action represents yet another unnecessary and cruel move to target the transgender community with animus and discrimination for political gain.”
According to the Movement Advancement Project, at least five U.S. states currently ban all changes to gender markers on birth certificates and nine states severely limit gender marker changes on driver’s licenses. Other states, including Montana, have passed legislation that redefines sex in an attempt to limit transgender people’s rights. Kansas is also among at least 10 states with a law on the books that bans transgender people from using facilities, like changing rooms and bathrooms, that align with their gender identities.
Gov. Laura Kelly (D) has said that the anti-trans laws are being pushed by national organizations that have an agenda to systematically implement laws that strip rights away from trans people at the state level across the country. This legislative session, Governor Kelly vetoed a slew of anti-trans laws, including SB 180, which was later overridden by the legislature. “By stripping away rights from Kansans and opening the state up to expensive and unnecessary lawsuits, these bills would hurt our ability to continue breaking economic records and landing new business deals,” Kelly said when vetoing these bills in April.
In response to Kobach’s interpretation of SB180, Kelly has vowed that the state would “keep in place … policies regarding gender markers on birth certificates and driver’s licenses,” which prompted a lawsuit filed by Kobach on July 7.
Three days after the lawsuit was filed, District Judge Teresa Watson enacted a temporary restraining order, effectively blocking the administration from issuing updated licenses for the next two weeks. The Kansas Department of Revenue has asked Judge Watson to reverse her decision, alleging that the legislature erred when it enacted the anti-trans law.
The ACLU’s motion to intervene contends that the five transgender Kansans they are representing would suffer irreparable harm if they are not able to change their gender marker on their licenses. If the ACLU’s motion to intervene is granted, the organization will be able to fight Kobach’s anti-trans agenda in court.
“Our clients deserve to live their lives free of harassment, discrimination, and violence —- all consequences that Mr. Kobach’s erroneous legal interpretations are designed to encourage,” Brett said in a statement.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.