Skip to content Skip to footer

Immigrant Steel Workers March Against Unjust Firings

Pacific Steel workers march through Berkeley. (Photo: David Bacon)

Berkeley, California – Two hundred immigrant workers, their wives, husbands, children and hundreds of supporters marched through downtown Berkeley February 17, protesting their firing from Pacific Steel Castings, one of the city's largest employers. Starting at City Hall, they walked for an hour past stores and homes, as bystanders often applauded. Teachers and students at a Montessori school along the route even came out to the sidewalk to urge them on.

At a rally before the march started, fired worker Jesus Prado told the assembled crowd, “I worked for Pacific Steel for seven years. We've organized this March for Dignity because we want to stop the way they're stepping on us and treating us like criminals. We came here to work, not to break any laws.”

“Many of us are buying homes, or have lived in our homes for years,” added another fired worker, Ana Castaño. “We have children in the schools. We pay taxes and contribute to our community. What is happening to us is not just and hurts our families. All we did was work. That shouldn't be treated like it's a crime.”

Berkeley City Council member Jesse Arreguin agreed. “We're here today to send a message to the Obama administration that the I-9 raids have to stop,” he told the crowd.

Two hundred fourteen workers were fired in December and January, as a result of a so-called silent raid, in which the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arm of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) inspected the company's records to find workers who don't have legal immigration status. ICE then demanded that the company fire them, because it said they lacked legal immigration status.

Berkeley City Councilmember Jesse Arreguin speaks to the marchers before they set out. (Photo: David Bacon)

For over a year, these workers have held meetings in union halls and churches, distributed food to families hungry because they can no longer work and spoken to elected officials. The march was the culmination of months of debate in which they weighed the consequences of making their firings public and, therefore, their immigration status as well. “We know Berkeley is a sanctuary city,” one worker explained. “This is about the safest place we can think of to do have this march. What happened to us was unjust and we feel we have to protest, if not for ourselves, then for others who face the same injustice.”

In fact, thousands of workers have been fired in recent years because of these immigration-related firings. Over a thousand janitors lost jobs in Minneapolis, 2,000 sewing machine operators lost jobs in Los Angeles and many more lost jobs across the country.

Cinthya Muñoz, of Alamed County United to Defend Immigrant Rights, condemns the firings and tells workers the community supports them. (Photo: David Bacon)

Since the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, employers have been prohibited from hiring undocumented workers and workers themselves have been forbidden to hold jobs. To keep track of immigration status, for a quarter-century all workers in the US have had to declare their immigration status on I-9 forms when they get hired. Now, the Obama administration has made the inspection of those forms and the firing of workers who can't show legal immigration status a centerpiece of its immigration enforcement strategy.

Throughout the march, chants and shouts condemned the administration. Activists in the crowd pointed out that President Obama is attacking the communities of immigrants and people of color who were his strongest supporters in his 2008 presidential election campaign. In fact, at the time, Obama promised he would adopt a more humane approach toward immigration enforcement than his predecessor, who became notorious for factory raids and mass deportations. Candidate Obama said he'd work to reform immigration law so that immigrants could enjoy greater rights. Once in office, however, the administration not only continued President Bush's policy of enforcing immigration law in the workplace, but vastly expanded I-9 audits and firings.

A worker holds a sign saying, “We're not criminals! We're workers!” (Photo: David Bacon)

ICE began its audit of the I-9 forms of workers at Pacific Steel last February. In March, the workers and their union, Molders Union Local 164B, struck the plant for a week to turn back company demands in contract negotiations that would have had them pay more for their health coverage. According to legal charges filed at the time by the union, the ICE audit should have stopped at that point, since the agency's own internal rules call for it to avoid any enforcement actions during labor disputes.

The audit, however, continued. At the same time, throughout the following spring and summer, city councils in Berkeley, Oakland and Alameda passed resolutions calling on ICE to abandon it, to allow the workers to continue working and the company to function normally. Similar resolutions and letters poured into the office of DHS Secretary (and former Arizona Gov. ) Janet Napolitano from unions, labor councils, community and immigrant rights organizations and local elected officials.

Workers and supporters brought their children, to dramatize the impact the firings make on families. (Photo: David Bacon)

Nevertheless, in November, ICE sent Pacific Steel a letter listing the names of the 214 individuals it insisted lacked visas, according to its database. If the workers could not provide other valid documents, ICE demanded that the company fire them.

About half the workers live in nearby Richmond and San Pablo. Richmond Mayor Gayle McLaughlin condemned the firings and accused ICE of undermining the city's already devastated economy in the middle of a recession. “Their firing is a violation of their human rights,” she said at a local food drive for the workers. “When they say that these raids are targeting criminals, it's not true. People who are just trying to make a living are being targeted big time.”

In front of a local Montessori school, staff and students came out to the sidewalk to applaud the marchers. (Photo: David Bacon)

Councilman Arreguin, one of the first elected officials to support the workers last year, added, “The company and the workers pay taxes that support local schools and services. We could lose money we desperately need in these challenging economic times. The workers' paychecks inject hundreds of thousands of dollars into our local economy every month that support other businesses and families. All this is placed in jeopardy by the audit. It is not necessary to enforce immigration law in a way that is so destructive to workers, their families, their employer and our entire community.”

Some other public officials, however, attacked the idea that local communities should defend the workers and said the workers were “stealing jobs,” despite the fact that many of those fired had worked over a decade in the foundry. Arreguin responded, “An immigration audit leading to the firing of these workers will not create a single job. Instead, it will force them into the underground economy where illegal wages and conditions are prevalent. It will not improve wages and conditions in the foundry. There is already a union contract in place that guarantees healthcare, pensions and wages that can support families.”

As the march reached the foundry, workers and supporters showed their anger and frustration over the firings. (Photo: David Bacon)

On the day of the march, the company and union released a joint statement, in which Pacific Steel declared, “These terminations were not only devastating to the workers and their families, but also to the workforce at PSC. The company is proud to have a workforce of extraordinary longevity and skill. Many PSC employees have worked here for decades, earning generous wages and benefits for their hard work and dedication to the company … [We] implore the protestors to direct their attention to the Department of Homeland Security and federal policy makers.”

The union also criticized “the broken and unfair laws used by the government to disrupt and destroy the lives of many of our friends and colleagues.”

Metzli Blanco Castaño told marchers about her worries for her own future. (Photo: David Bacon)

The rallies that began and ended the march made the human cost of the firings plain. Metzli Blanco Castaño, the daughter of Ana Castaño and David Herrera, both fired Pacific Steel workers, told supporters of her concern for her own future. “I've lived in the Bay Area my entire life and now I might not be able to stay,” she said. Like many others, her parents have exhausted their savings and their home is now in foreclosure.

One of the justifications made by Obama administration officials for the audits is that, if undocumented immigrants cannot work or find other jobs, they'll be forced to leave the country in a process euphemistically called “self-deportation.” Yet, among the 214 workers and their families, hardly anyone plans to return to Mexico. “We came because there was no work for us in Mexico and we couldn't survive,” said David Herrera, Metzli's father. “That hasn't changed. There's nothing to return to.”

The march passed the foundry buildings where the workers used to work. (Photo: David Bacon)

Bill Ong Hing, law professor at the University of San Francisco, says the lack of jobs in Mexico is a consequence of free trade and structural adjustment policies designed to benefit large corporations. He calls the administration's justification divorced from reality. “Employer sanctions [the section of immigration law that prohibits undocumented people from working] have not reduced undocumented migration at all. They've failed because NAFTA [the North American Free Trade Agreement] and globalization create great migration pressure. Trying to discourage workers from coming by arresting them for working without authorization, or trying to prevent them from finding work, is doomed to fail in the face of such economic pressure. To reduce it, we need to change our trade and economic policies so that they don't produce poverty in countries like Mexico.”

Rev. Deborah Lee of the Interfaith Coalition for Immigrant Rights called this kind of enforcement a violation of the workers' basic human rights, “These families have done nothing wrong,” she said. “They're being punished for working, which is what people in our community are supposed to do. We will not let this happen in silence, nor allow these workers to be treated as though they are invisible.”

As hundreds of people filled Second Street, a block away from the foundry where they'd put in their years of labor, the fired workers were certainly not invisible any longer.

Religious leaders and fired workers, like Jesus Prado, placed hearts in a basket to symbolize the idea that the workers are part of the heart of the East Bay community, and pledged to send the hearts in a letter to Homeland Secretary Janet Napollitano. (Photo: David Bacon)

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $81,000 in one-time donations and to add 1250 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy