Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Obamacare: The GOP’s Waterloo

(Photo: Pete Souza / White House)

Right now, we are witnessing an epic battle for the future of this country. And depending on how this battle turns out, America will either fulfill the ideals of its founders and become a society that works for everyone or surrender to the billionaire hustlers who want to destroy everything the Founders stood for.

The origins of this existential battle are pretty simple. Throughout this country’s history, believers in two different visions of what American society should be have duked it out over every single aspect of public policy.

On the one hand, there is the vision of America as a “we society,” a society that recognizes certain things, like health care or education, as basic rights, and agrees to provide these things in common to everyone, regardless of race or class.

This vision was shared by most of the founding fathers and by people like president Franklin Roosevelt, who proposed a Second Bill of Rights in his 1944 State of the Union address that would have made economic rights like education, housing, and Social Security protected under the Constitution just like the rights to free speech.

“We society” Americans believe that we’re all in this together and want to create a country that ensures that everyone can, if they wish, enjoy “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” They believe the best way to do this is to use government to regulate business and to provide things, like healthcare, that the free-market makes too expensive for everyday people to afford.

The other vision of society that has shaped this country’s history sees America as a “me” society. Believers in “me society” America, like the Tea Party’s favorite “philosopher” Ayn Rand, want individuals to get as much wealth as possible, even if doing so comes at the expense of the economy, the country, and even the planet.

The best way to do this, believers in a “me” society say, is to shrink government and let private enterprise or private charities provide services, like education or healthcare, that everyone needs to survive.

The richest .01 of Americans are natural defenders of a “me society.” That’s because doing so works to their benefit, and they frankly don’t give a damn about the rest of us. If they get sick, they can afford the best hospitals; if they have a kid, they can send them to the best schools. All they really care about is protecting their wealth, and they do so by lobbying for policies that deregulate big business and big banks.

Today, the difference between “me society” and “we society” America is probably best represented by two wealthy donors: George Soros and David Koch. Both men are multi-billionaires, but use their wealth to fund organizations with very different values and goals.

While Soros sends money to groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Council of La Raza, groups that ensure that our country provides equal opportunities for all, Koch and his brother Charles send their money to groups like the Heartland Institute and Mackinac Center, groups that work to dismantle protections for middle-class Americans and lobby for policies that benefit the corporate elite. Soros donates to programs which cut into the power of the wealthy and improve the lot of average Americans; the Kochs donate to programs which increase the power of the .01 percent.

It’s become almost a cliché for Democrats and Republicans to use the Kochs and Soros as bogeymen representing each other’s parties, but there’s a reason for this: their political activities show the divide between the goals of “we society” and “me society” America, goals shared by our two major political parties.

And right now, the number one goal of billionaire “me society” America and its front group, the Republican Party, is to sabotage Obamacare. That’s why the Tea Party, on behalf of its wealthy backers, has shut down the government: it wants to make sure that Obamacare never goes into effect.

“Me society” billionaires know that if Obamacare goes into effect and succeeds, then it will be game over for them and everything they support. Americans will realize that government works. If people start buying insurance at health exchanges and that insurance is cheaper and better than expected, then Americans will discover that Obamacare isn’t some evil socialist scheme, but a rational solution to a basic fact: people need health care and the government is the only institution capable of making sure they can get it at a fair cost.

The “me society” billionaires fear that once Americans understand that, they’ll start to see through all the Republican Party’s other lies about the dangers of government regulation of the pharmaceutical industry, the oil industry and Wall Street.

And those same “me society” billionaires know that once Americans see through those lies, they’ll stop voting for Tea Party crusaders and start voting for people who actually care about the good of society as a whole. They’ll vote for people who believe in America as a “we,” not a “me” society. And once that happens, any political advantage the “me society” once had will vanish, just like that.

Back in 2009, South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint, a Tea Party star and the current president of the Heritage Foundation, said that President Obama’s push for a new healthcare law would be Obama’s “Waterloo,” a reference to the 1815 battle that marked the end of Napoleon’s reign as conqueror of Europe.

He told a conference call of conservative activists that, “”If we’re able to stop Obama on this [health care reform], it will be his Waterloo. It will break him and we will show that we can, along with the American people, begin to push those freedom solutions that work in every area of our society.”

DeMint was right, in a way. Obamacare is a Waterloo of sorts. But not for the President. It’s a Waterloo for the Republican Party and the “me” vision of society it represents. Because if the Republican Party loses on Obamacare, it loses everything. It loses the right to say, as Reagan did, that government is “part of the problem, not part of the solution.”

Ignore all the tough talk from John Boehner and Ted Cruz. Republicans are terrified. And they’re going to lose.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.