Skip to content Skip to footer

Democratic Women Candidates Benefit From Surge in Donations From Female Donors

An analysis of Federal Election Commission data shows female candidates tend to benefit most from female donors.

Sen. Kristen Gillibrand and Sen. Claire McCaskill talk with reporters as they arrive at the US Capitol on November 20, 2013, via way of the senate subway.

With the 2018 elections well underway, women have led a surge in political activity, both as candidates and as donors. We are not only witnessing women setting records in the number of secured major party nominations for the US House, but we are also seeing a significant increase in the percentage of congressional campaign contributions coming from women. However, over the course of this record-breaking political year, the gender gap still looms strong and the party gap even stronger.

Looking at the congressional campaign contributions from women over time, an analysis of Federal Election Commission data shows female candidates tend to benefit most from female donors.

Candidate Gender From Women From Men % From Women
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) F $6,138,477 $4,711,267 56.58%
Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) F $5,319,914 $4,838,775 52.37%
Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) F $5,548,105 $5,221,883 51.51%
Jane Raybould (D-NE) F $324,184 $310,644 51.06%
Bernie Sanders (I-VA) M $857,109 $881,550 49.30%
Tina Smith (D-MN) F $1,098,278 $1,133,714 49.21%
Howard Sherman (D-MS) M $181,900 $194,350 48.35%
Beto O’Rourke (D-TX) M $6,456,949 $7,098,569 47.63%
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) F $2,295,197 $2,545,560 47.41%
Claire McCaskill (D-MO) F $10,193,774 $11,459,674 47.08%

For the 2018 election cycle, seven of the top ten Senate candidates with the highest percentage of itemized contributions from women are active female candidates. All of the top recipients are white candidates, only two come from southern states, and all but Sanders are Democrats.

Of the total number of campaign contributions in the 2018 congressional elections, 34 percent came from female donors, a significant increase from 2016. The number of campaign contributions from women in this election cycle — almost $296 million so far — is more than the total amount of money given by women in the 2016 elections — nearly $286 million. The total percentage could still tick upwards in the coming weeks of election season.

GOP women are struggling to ride the same wave as their Democratic female counterparts. Although the amount of money coming from women has increased in these elections, Republican candidates have not seen the benefits of this trend. Historically, campaign cash from women favors Democrats, and the trend has continued in these elections. 45 percent of campaign contributions for Democratic female candidates come from women — much more than the 29 percent their Republican female counterparts receive from women. The amount of money coming from female donors has remained static for Republican women and the amount of money coming from female donors has fallen for Republican men.

Since the 2016 elections, the percentage of campaign contributions coming from women for Republican men has dropped precipitously. Moreover, the total number of campaign contributions given by women to Democratic women has surpassed the total number of contributions given by women to Republican men.

So far in the 2018 congressional elections, Democratic women have received $95.6 million in campaign contributions from women, which is a stark difference compared to the $64.8 million Republican men have received from women. During the 2016 congressional elections, Republican men received nearly $106 million in congressional campaign contributions from women and Democratic women received $74.9 million.

Despite the steady increase of cash from female donors, men still make up the vast majority of campaign contributions to congressional candidates — 66 percent of campaign contributions come from male donors. Democratic men have received the highest amount of congressional campaign contributions from both female and male donors. Democratic men have received $120.2 million in congressional campaign contributions from women and $217 million from men. All of which is to say that the story here is about party in addition to gender.

Although male donors still dominate campaign contributions, women have come a long way. Since the last ‘Year of the Woman’ in 1992 — when Anita Hill’s treatment by the Senate Judiciary Committee fueled a similar record-breaking wave of women participating in elections — we’ve witnessed a huge increase in the percentage of congressional campaign contributions coming from female donors.

In 1992, 26 percent of all congressional campaign contributions came from women. That number has now increased to 34 percent in these current elections. Only seven House candidates in 1992 received half or more of their campaign contributions from women. In 2016, the number was 12. So far in the 2018 elections, 51 House candidates and four Senate candidates have received half or more of their campaign contributions from women. Female donors and candidates have a long way to go to decrease the gender donation gap, but they’re certainly getting closer to cracking this particular glass ceiling.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.