Washington, DC – Unregulated, undisclosed spending made possible by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission has left local communities defenseless against big money national organizations intent on interfering with their elections, according to a report released today by Public Citizen.
In its report, “Outside Spenders, Local Elections,” Public Citizen outlines several relatively obscure local elections that the 501(c)(4) group Americans for Prosperity sought to influence. The report chronicles six elections in which Americans for Prosperity, founded by billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, drowned out local issues to pursue its own agenda.
According to its website, Americans for Prosperity purports to work on several broad policy and issue areas, including reducing government spending, weakening regulations and making changes to the judicial system.
“Elections – particularly local elections – shouldn’t be a playground for millionaires and billionaires,” said Adam Crowther, author of the report and a researcher for Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “In its obsession with establishing purported rights of billionaires, the Supreme Court weakened the voices of ordinary Americans, even on issues that were purely local.”
In at least one election, local residents lamented that issues that actually mattered were being pushed aside because of the involvement of Americans for Prosperity.
Although Americans for Prosperity does operate state affiliates, the affiliates are funded by the national group. In 2012, several state affiliate directors were among the highest paid employees of the national group.
Even though the identities of Americans for Prosperity’s donors remain secret, details that are disclosed to the public reveal that it is heavily reliant on a handful of giant donors. Of the group’s $115 million in 2012 revenue, nearly 78 percent came from donors who gave at least $1 million. Top donors gave $26 million, $21 million, $11 million, $10 million and $7 million, according to Americans for Prosperity’s 2012 990 tax form.
“The ultimate solution to this outside money problem as exemplified by Americans for Prosperity’s spending is a constitutional amendment that would allow Congress to place practical and reasonable limits on how money is raised and spent on our elections,” said Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “The fact that a few billionaires can use their massive fortunes to dictate the debate surrounding our elections is dangerous to our democracy. We urge Congress to pass such an amendment and to move interim solutions around transparency on dark money spending.
“In addition, the People’s Pledge – used to great effect by Scott Brown and Elizabeth Warren to keep outside money out of their Senate race – is a tool that can be used to curb negative ads bought by groups not associated with the candidates.”
Here are several local elections in which Americans for Prosperity involved itself:
- Kenosha, Wis., school board. In 2014, citing the school board’s willingness to negotiate with the local teacher’s union, Americans for Prosperity paid for canvassing and phone banking. Americans for Prosperity’s preferred candidates won each open seat.
- Douglass County, Colo., school board. In 2013, Americans for Prosperity spent $350,000 on a county school board race to maintain the composition of the sitting board, which had taken steps to weaken teachers unions.
- Lakeview, Minn., mayor’s race. Matt Little, a city councilor who ran for mayor of Lakeview, Minn., in 2012, was accused by Americans for Prosperity of supporting unions when Little voted to preserve a part-time electrician job. Little won his race.
- Coralville, Iowa, city elections. Americans for Prosperity became involved in this 19,000-person town over debt the town had acquired to finance development projects. Each of Americans for Prosperity’s preferred candidates lost.
- Columbus, Ohio, zoo tax. In 2014, residents of Columbus, Ohio, voted on a levy that would raise property taxes to fund the Columbus Zoo. Americans for Prosperity reportedly spent more than $20,000 opposing the levy, which failed.
- Iron County, Wis., county board. Americans for Prosperity became involved in elections to the county board. The 6,000-person county was a proposed site of an open pit iron mine. Americans for Prosperity sent out mailers opposing several county board candidates, calling them “anti-mining radicals.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy