Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump — Who Claims He Doesn’t Want War — Threatens “Official End of Iran”

Numerous critics condemned President Trump’s Sunday threat over Twitter as “genocidal.”

President Trump stops to talk to reporters as he walks to Marine One at the White House on Tuesday, May 14, 2019, in Washington, D.C.

As military tensions between the U.S. and Iran appeared to be gradually cooling despite dangerous provocations from the White House, President Donald Trump — who said publicly last week that he hopes there is not another war in the Middle East — took to Twitter Sunday to threaten “the official end of Iran,” a remark numerous critics condemned as “genocidal.”

“If Iran wants to fight, that will be the official end of Iran. Never threaten the United States again!” Trump tweeted, without specifying how Iran threatened the United States.

Matthew Gertz, a senior fellow at Media Matters for America, speculated that Trump’s threat was prompted by a Fox News segment on Iran.

The U.S. president’s tweet came after a rocket was reportedly fired into Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone, about a mile away from the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. There is no evidence that Iran-backed forces were behind the attack, despite reported “suspicions” from Western diplomats.

Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), said in a statement late Sunday that a “similar incident” in Iraq last year “led to Bolton asking the Pentagon for options to militarily strike Iran.”

“President Trump’s saber-rattling about Iran has reached a dangerous new low with his threat to ‘end’ Iran — a country of 83 million men, women, and children,” Abdi said. “There is no doubt that national security adviser John Bolton will use the slightest Iranian action — even bereft of reliable intelligence — as a pretext to push for the war he’s always wanted.”

“President Trump has claimed that he doesn’t want war, but his bombastic rhetoric is ensuring that he walks into one,” Abdi added. “If Trump is sincere about wanting diplomatic compromise, he should cease his policy of economic warfare that is strangling the Iranian people and pursue a tone of mutual respect with Tehran.”

Describing Trump’s tweet as “genocidal rhetoric,” NIAC founder Trita Parsi outlined steps the president should be taking if he actually desires peace with Iran:

Trump’s latest threat against Iran came just days after reports on U.S. intelligence challenged the White House narrative of a growing Iranian “threat” in the region, which has been used by American officials like Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to justify aggressive posturing in the Persian Gulf.

The president’s tweet also came as some corporate media outlets and commentators have portrayed Trump as a lone voice against war with Iran in a White House filled with hawks.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Iranian actions in the Middle East in recent weeks have been defensive moves in response to fears that the U.S. could be planning a military attack.

As Common Dreams reported, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani earlier this month called for diplomacy amid U.S. belligerence and urged new negotiations on the Iran nuclear accord, which Trump unilaterally violated last May.

“Since the president reneged on the Iran nuclear deal last year,” said Abdi, “the administration’s policies have been geared towards provoking Iran into retaliation to give cover for a perilous escalation favored by administration hawks.”

“Simply stated, the current state of heightened tensions between the U.S. and Iran is exclusively due to the policies of the Trump administration, which abandoned a nonproliferation agreement that was working in favor of a so-called ‘maximum pressure campaign.'”

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $50,000 to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?