Former Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a key witness in the first impeachment of former President Donald Trump in 2019, has filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump Jr., Rudy Giuliani, and two former White House staffers, alleging that they engaged in witness intimidation against him.
Citing the Ku Klux Klan Act – a 19th century law that bars threats or intimidation toward government officials who are carrying out their constitutional duties – Vindman alleged that the group of Trump allies engaged in a conspiracy of witness tampering against him over his testimony in the 2019 impeachment proceedings; in his testimony, Vindman discussed the former president’s attempts to compel Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to find him political dirt on Joe Biden a year ahead of the 2020 presidential election.
“It has always been fair game to criticize public figures,” Vindman wrote in an op-ed for USA Today following the submission of his lawsuit. “But what happened to me was something different. I was attacked in a way calculated to inflict maximum personal and professional damage likely in order to prevent me from testifying or to punish me for doing so. In this country, that violates the law.”
At the time of his testimony, Vindman was director for European Affairs at the National Security Council. At least twice, he raised concerns to his superiors about Trump’s intimidation of Zelensky in the July 2019 call.
Vindman alleges that the Trump operatives named in his lawsuit retaliated against him by temporarily blocking his promotion in the Army, and by removing him and his brother from White House positions.
There was “an intentional, concerted campaign of unlawful intimidation and retaliation” against him, the lawsuit alleges.
“This campaign of intimidation and retaliation has had severe and deeply personal ramifications for Lt. Col. Vindman,” the lawsuit goes on. “It also left a stain on our democracy.”
Although Donald Trump Sr. is not named in the suit, the former president did engage in what could be considered retaliatory action against Vindman. In the fall of 2019, around the time Vindman gave his testimony, Trump told the press that he would share damaging information that revealed the former Army official was acting in a partisan manner when he decided to speak to impeachment investigators.
However, Trump never followed through on his threat and it’s unclear if such evidence even exists.
Rather, Vindman explained during his testimony that he decided to speak out about Trump’s attempted quid pro quo with Ukraine because the former president’s actions could “undermine U.S. national security.”
“I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,” Vindman said during his deposition more than two years ago. “I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma (the energy company) it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play, which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.