On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected two challenges to a federal regulation banning the use of bump stocks, accessories to semiautomatic weapons that allow the discharge of several bullets every time the trigger is pulled (as opposed to just one).
The cases in question — Aposhian v. Garland and Gun Owners of America v. Garland — involved plaintiffs who had sued the federal government over changes the Department of Justice (DOJ) had made to the definition of machine guns, which are barred from common use and ownership in the U.S. save for very limited circumstances. The plaintiffs in those cases filed lawsuits on the grounds that the DOJ did not have the authority to redefine machine guns and therefore the regulation change was improper.
Appellate courts found that the alteration was not improper, however, and upheld the DOJ’s changes. On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to hear the challenges to those rulings, meaning that fewer than four justices on the Court believed either case was worth hearing.
The Court did not elaborate on why it refused the cases.
Neither of the cases asserted that plaintiffs’ Second Amendment rights to own weapons had been violated, meaning that a challenge on those grounds could come about in the future.
For the time being, however, the regulation change will stay intact, and bump stocks will remain illegal in the U.S. A person can face up to 10 years in prison for owning a bump stock, and be fined up to $250,000.
The decision to reject the cases has been celebrated as a win by gun reform advocates. It’s an unusual action for the far right Supreme Court, which late in its last term loosened gun laws in New York and several other states, ruling that laws requiring individuals to demonstrate a need to carry a weapon in public before getting a concealed carry weapon were unconstitutional.
The DOJ changes — which altered definitions within laws regulating how the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) operates — were implemented following a 2017 mass shooting at a music festival in Las Vegas, Nevada, in which a gunman killed 58 people and wounded hundreds more as he opened fire from above in his hotel room. Following the shooting, then-President Donald Trump called for the agency to deem bump stocks illegal, despite his generally anti-regulatory viewpoints on guns.
The DOJ issued its final rule in December 2018, writing:
The term ‘machine gun’ includes bump-stock devices, i.e., devices that allow a semiautomatic firearm to shoot more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger by harnessing the recoil energy of the semi-automatic firearm to which it is affixed so that the trigger resets and continues firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter.
The policy went into effect in 2019.
Polling after the Las Vegas shooting showed wide support for a bump stock ban, though policy experts were unsure that such a ban would lessen gun deaths, especially in mass shootings, as the majority of mass shootings both before and after the Las Vegas massacre didn’t involve bump stocks. Meanwhile, the number of mass shootings this year is on pace to reach nearly the same levels as in 2017.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.