The U.S. Senate has passed the Respect for Marriage Act, legislation that aims to enshrine federal protections for same-sex marriages in the United States.
The bill passed in the upper house of Congress on Tuesday evening by a vote of 61-38. Just 12 Republican lawmakers voted in favor of the bill, while the remaining members of the party voted against it.
A similar bill passed earlier this year in the House of Representatives, but because an amendment was added to the Senate version of the bill (enshrining protections for those who claim to have religious objections to same-sex marriages), it will have to be passed again within that chamber. The House vote will likely take place sometime next week, and the revised bill is expected to pass.
After that, the bill will move to the desk of President Joe Biden, who has said he will sign the legislation into law.
Although the Supreme Court declared same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states in its 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, many warned that the Court’s sharp right turn in recent years warranted federal legislation to further protect marriage equality — especially following the Court ruling earlier this year that overturned abortion rights recognized in the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, which included a concurring decision from Justice Clarence Thomas indicating that he believed other decisions based on the right to privacy, including Obergefell, should be reexamined.
A summary of the bill from its cosponsors states that the act would “require the federal government to recognize a marriage between two individuals if the marriage was valid in the state where it was performed.” If Obergefell is upended, 35 states would automatically revert to banning same-sex marriages due to lasting statutes on their books that existed prior to the landmark ruling. The bill would not require those states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples if Obergefell is overturned, but would require them to recognize such marriages if they were performed elsewhere.
The bill officially repeals the Defense of Marriage Act, a homophobic law from the mid-1990s that stated that the federal government would not recognize same-sex marriages.
The language of the bill also includes protections for interracial marriages, which were enshrined by the judicial branch in the Supreme Court’s Loving v. Virginia ruling in 1967.
Supporters of the bill — including lead sponsor Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin), the first openly lesbian member of the Senate — lauded its passage as a significant step forward.
“Today, an overwhelming majority of Senators stepped up to protect the freedoms and rights of millions of Americans in same-sex and interracial marriages,” said Baldwin. “I’m proud to have worked across the aisle to get the job done for millions of loving couples in Wisconsin and across the country.”
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a cosponsor of the bill, also celebrated its passage. “Tonight, the Senate took a historic step to help prevent discrimination, promote equality and protect the rights of all Americans by passing the Respect for Marriage Act that @SenatorBaldwin and I authored,” Collins wrote in a tweet.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York), whose daughter is married to a woman, commemorated the passage of the bill in the Senate.
“The Respect for Marriage Act is a momentous step toward greater justice for millions of Americans. No one in a same-sex marriage or an interracial marriage should have to worry if their marriage will be invalidated,” Schumer said.
PFLAG National celebrated the ruling while reminding their followers on Twitter that marriage equality alone will not achieve LGBTQ liberation. “While we still need the #EqualityAct to deliver much-needed anti-discrimination protections, passage of the Respect for Marriage Act moves us closer to achieving full equality for #LGBTQ+ people and their families,” the organization tweeted.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy