A grassroots ballot initiative in Michigan to recognize abortion as a fundamental right in the state constitution will be included on the November ballot, after organizers successfully submitted hundreds of thousands of signatures in support of the measure.
Reproductive Freedom for All, a coalition of pro-abortion organizations that include the Michigan American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Planned Parenthood of Michigan and Michigan Voices, submitted 753,759 signatures on Monday in support of including a question on the right to abortion services in the state in this year’s midterm election. If a majority of voters vote in favor of it, the state would have to recognize abortion as a constitutionally protected right.
Organizers only needed to drop off 425,059 signatures to the state Secretary of State’s office in order for the initiative to be on the November ballot. The total turned in is the largest the state has ever seen in its history of ballot drives.
Organizers lauded their success after being able to submit more than 300,000 signatures than were necessary to get the measure on the ballot.
“The number of signatures showed that here in Michigan we trust women. We trust people. We trust doctors, not politicians, to make decisions about our body, our pregnancy and parenthood,” said Reproductive Freedom for All spokesperson Shanay Watson-Whittaker.
The ballot question asks Michiganders to answer, “yes” or “no,” whether they agree with the idea that “every person has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which involves the right to make and carry out decisions without political interference about all matters relating to pregnancy, including birth control, abortion, prenatal care, and childbirth.”
The ballot would still allow for lawmakers to impose some restrictions on abortion depending on fetal viability. Such restrictions can only occur, however, when a fetus is determined capable of surviving outside of the uterus “without the application of extraordinary medical measures,” according to the proposal.
The measure is considered necessary because of an anti-abortion law in Michigan that dates back to 1931. Due to the far right members of the Supreme Court upending abortion rights in a decision overturning Roe v. Wade last month, that 1931 statute is now technically the law in the state, although a state judge has blocked its enforcement so far, finding it inconsistent with the Michigan constitution.
If that judge’s injunction were lifted, however, the 1931 ban that would come into force would prohibit abortion at all stages, with the only exception being if the pregnant person’s life were at stake.
Michigan isn’t the only state with a post-Roe abortion question set to be decided by a statewide vote. In Kansas, voters will decide next month, during the primary elections, whether their state constitution recognizes the right to an abortion, a measure put forward by Republican lawmakers who disagree with a state Supreme Court ruling of 2019 protecting a person’s right to access the procedure. Voters in Kentucky will cast a similar vote on the question of whether their state constitution recognizes abortion rights, in the fall general election.
Most voters in Michigan appear prepared to vote in favor of the ballot initiative. According to a WDIV/Detroit News poll published earlier this month, most residents (57.7 percent) believe the federal Supreme Court’s ruling ending abortion protections was wrongly decided, while just a little more than a third (34.2 percent) say they agree with the decision.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.