Over the past decades, the fossil fuel industry has worked around the clock to exercise its influence over every level of politics — with moves including, as a new report reveals, injecting its lobbyists into the very groups that are purportedly working at the front lines to combat the climate crisis.
According to a new database published by divestment advocacy group F Minus on Wednesday, there are over 1,500 state-level lobbyists who are working as lobbyists for fossil fuel companies while being employed by a wide variety of state and municipal governments and progressive, climate and research groups, as first reported by The Guardian.
At least 150 universities — including ones that have vowed to divest from fossil fuels, like California State University, Syracuse University and the University of Washington — have ties to this vast network of fossil fuel lobbyists, who F Minus refer to as “compromised.” Tech companies that present themselves as progressive and forward-thinking like Apple, Microsoft and Google have hired lobbyists with ties to the Koch network and a variety of fossil fuel companies, like Exxon.
Supposedly left-leaning cities whose leadership has vowed action on the climate crisis, including Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles and Philadelphia, have hired these lobbyists. The database reveals at least seven lobbyists who work for companies like Exxon and Phillips also representing interests in Montana, where a district court just finished hearing arguments in a landmark case brought by 16 youth residents who say that the government’s failure to protect them against the climate crisis is against the state’s constitution.
Even big climate groups whose stated missions are to advocate for the climate and environment have hired these lobbyists.
As F Minus found, the Environmental Defense Action Fund, the advocacy arm of climate group Environmental Defense Fund, employs multiple lobbyists who also advocate for Exxon, as well as fossil gas producers like Calpine and Duke Energy. The Natural Resources Defense Council’s (NRDC) political fund employs a lobbyist for Duke Energy and another lobbyist group that also works for mining and fossil gas company BHP.
“When you hire these insider lobbyists, you are basically working with double agents,” Brown University environmental sociologist Timmons Roberts told The Guardian. “They are guns for hire.”
The findings reveal not just how far the fossil fuel industry has extended its influence over the national energy sphere, but also how covertly it does so. They speak to the extraordinary uphill battle that climate advocates face in the mission to convince lawmakers and officials to draw down the use of fossil fuels as the climate crisis only continues to worsen.
“It’s incredible that this has gone under the radar for so long, as these lobbyists help the fossil fuel industry wield extraordinary power,” James Browning, a former lobbyist for Common Cause who helped put together the database for F Minus, told The Guardian. “Many of these cities and counties face severe costs from climate change and yet elected officials are selling their residents out. It’s extraordinary.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 48 hours to add 242 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.