A number of health experts have condemned President Trump’s decision over the weekend to use the presidential motorcade to greet supporters outside the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center as he received treatment for COVID-19, calling it inappropriate and unsafe, particularly for Secret Service agents that were forced to ride along with him.
The reckless attempt by the president to convey strength to voters may backfire, as majorities in a number of polls have faulted Trump for not taking the pandemic seriously even after he received a positive diagnosis for COVID-19, which has killed nearly 215,000 Americans.
Trump waved to a number of his most ardent and loyal base of supporters from within his presidential SUV, where many agents were sitting in close proximity to him.
A number of health experts, including James Phillips, an attending physician at Walter Reed, decried the action, noting that the move carried a risk of COVID-19 transmission between persons within the vehicle.
“That Presidential SUV is not only bulletproof, but hermetically sealed against chemical attack,” Phillips said in a tweet on Sunday. “The risk of COVID19 transmission inside is as high as it gets outside of medical procedures.”
He further blasted Trump for the decision to greet the supporters at the risk of the agents.
“The irresponsibility is astounding. My thoughts are with the Secret Service forced to play” along with the photo op, Phillips added.
Robert Wachter, chairman of the department of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, noted that, if we’re to believe reports that Trump’s condition is improving, the drive itself wasn’t particularly harmful to him. However, to those who were in the vehicle with the president — the “joy ride,” as Wachter put it — placed agents in significant danger.
“The Secret Service agents take a vow to protect him, but they don’t take a vow to be protected from him, and I think he is putting them at absolutely unnecessary risk,” Wachter added.
However, Michael Baker, an epidemiologist from the University of Otago in New Zealand, said that Trump’s drive around Walter Reed should not have been allowed, given the types of medications he was taking that indicate he may be sicker than he’s letting on.
“A patient who is sick enough to be admitted to hospital and treated with strong medications like dexamethasone should not be leaving hospital for a non-essential drive prior to their discharge,” Baker told CNBC. “Traveling in a car with several staff members while still in isolation also poses a risk of infecting those other exposed passengers. There was no obvious justification for this action.”
Health experts weren’t the only ones expressing criticism over the president exposing his illness unnecessarily to Secret Service agents. Former and current agents, too, expressed disdain for the action.
“Where are the adults?” one former agent said to The Washington Post.
A current Secret Service agent, speaking anonymously to avoid retribution from the White House, appeared to agree that Trump’s decision to drive around the hospital, forcing agents to be in the car with him, was callous. “He’s not even pretending to care now,” that agent said.
The president appears to be obsessed with appearing strong while being treated for the disease, even going so far as to demand to leave the hospital early, according to some sources. But this latest publicity stunt might not be received well by voters, who, as recent polling demonstrates, do not seem very sympathetic to Trump’s recent diagnosis.
An ABC News/Ipsos poll that was released mere hours before Trump’s cruise in front of Walter Reed found that 72 percent of Americans felt Trump did not take “the appropriate precautions” regarding ensuring he was keeping himself safe from COVID-19. That same percentage also said Trump did not take the “risk of contracting the virus seriously enough” either.
The poll also found that 64 percent of Americans disapprove of his response to coronavirus, similar to where Trump polled on the question before he tested positive for the disease.
A separate Reuters/Ipsos poll had similar findings, with 57 percent of voters saying they disapproved of Trump’s response to coronavirus. The Reuters/Ipsos poll, which took place after the president’s diagnosis was made public, found that Trump’s Democratic challenger for president, Joe Biden, was faring better in the run-up to the election, ahead of Trump by a margin of 51 percent to 41 percent, an increase of 1 to 2 points versus Biden’s lead in recent weeks.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.