With all the craziness at home, I didn’t have time to comment on the European Central Bank’s decision earlier this month to raise rates despite continuing very high unemployment.
The first thing to say is that overall euro-zone numbers look very much like numbers in the United States: a blip in headline inflation due to commodity prices, but low core inflation, and no sign of a wage-price spiral.
So the same arguments for continuing easy money at the Federal Reserve apply at the E.C.B. And the E.C.B. is not making sense: it’s raising rates even as its officials acknowledge that the rise in headline inflation is likely to be temporary.
But there’s another, euro-specific aspect to this story. During the pre-2008 eurobubble years, there were huge capital flows to peripheral economies, leading to a sharp rise in their costs relative to Germany’s. Now the bubble has burst, and one way or another those relative costs need to be brought back in line. But should that take place via German inflation or Spanish deflation? From a pan-European view, the answer is surely some of both — and given that deflation is always and everywhere very costly, the bulk of the adjustment should in fact take the form of rising wages in Germany rather than falling wages in Spain.
But what the E.C.B. is in effect signaling is that no inflation in Germany will be tolerated, placing all of the burden of adjustment on deflation in the periphery. From the beginning, euroskeptics worried about one-size-fits-all monetary policy; but what we’re getting is worse: one-size-fits-one, Germany first and only. That’s a recipe for a prolonged, painful slump in the periphery; large defaults, almost surely; a great deal of bitterness; and a significantly increased probability of a euro crackup. Aside from that, it’s prudent, reasonable policy.
The Road to the Euro Crisis
Some readers are confused when I talk about how the coming of the euro led to low interest rates in the European periphery.
It’s actually very clear in the data, as the graphic shows. As the euro became a done deal, countries that had previously had to pay a large interest premium found themselves able to borrow on the same terms as Germany; this translated into a big fall in their cost of capital.
The result was bubbles, inflation, and in the aftermath of the bubbles and inflation, what you see now.
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.
Paul Krugman joined The New York Times in 1999 as a columnist on the Op-Ed page and continues as a professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton University. He was awarded the Nobel in economic science in 2008.
Mr Krugman is the author or editor of 20 books and more than 200 papers in professional journals and edited volumes, including “The Return of Depression Economics” (2008) and “The Conscience of a Liberal” (2007). Copyright 2011 The New York Times.
Thank you for reading Truthout. Before you leave, we must appeal for your support.
Truthout is unlike most news publications; we’re nonprofit, independent, and free of corporate funding. Because of this, we can publish the boldly honest journalism you see from us – stories about and by grassroots activists, reports from the frontlines of social movements, and unapologetic critiques of the systemic forces that shape all of our lives.
Monied interests prevent other publications from confronting the worst injustices in our world. But Truthout remains a haven for transformative journalism in pursuit of justice.
We simply cannot do this without support from our readers. At this time, we’re appealing to add 50 monthly donors in the next 2 days. If you can, please make a tax-deductible one-time or monthly gift today.