Oklahoma State Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters (R) has suggested that discussion of race shouldn’t be included in lessons on the Tulsa Race Massacre, a white supremacist massacre in which a mob of white people murdered hundreds of Black residents and destroyed thousands of their homes and businesses over a century ago.
The superintendent’s comments came on the same weekend that a judge in Tulsa County dismissed a lawsuit from survivors of the attack who were seeking compensation from the city over its inaction in stopping the mob in 1921.
During a speaking engagement on Thursday in Norman, Oklahoma, Walters claimed that teachers shouldn’t delve into the topic of race during lessons on the Tulsa Race Massacre, one of the worst incidents of racial violence in U.S. history.
In response to a question about the massacre, Walters claimed that students shouldn’t be taught that they are “inherently racist” because they are the same race as past aggressors — despite the fact that students aren’t actually being taught this in classrooms.
“To say it was inherent in that because of their skin is where I say, ‘That’s critical race theory,'” Walters said. “You’re saying that a race defines a person, I reject that.”
Critical race theory is a set of college-level legal theories that examine how systemic racism and inequality are shaped by laws and legal precedents. Notably, the teachings of critical race theory do not include the assertion that some people are inherently racist.
Walters went on to say that a person examining historical atrocities should “be judgmental of the issue, of the action, of the content, of the character, of the individual, absolutely.” He then rejected that such lessons should include examinations of racism. “Let’s not tie to his skin color and say the skin color determined” a person’s actions, he said.
Video of Walters’s comments went viral on social media, leading many observers to condemn him for downplaying the role of race in the Tulsa Race Massacre. Walters later accused the media of “misrepresenting” his statements to create a “fake controversy.”
But although Walters said that “the events on that day were racist, evil, and it is inexcusable,” he continued to exploit the topic of the massacre to push cynical right-wing talking points about critical race theory.
“Kids should never be made to feel bad or told they are inferior based on the color of their skin,” Walters said, presumably referring to white children in history classrooms where discussions are had about racism.
Walters’s explanation was met with widespread outrage.
“How are you going to talk about a race massacre as if race isn’t part of the very cause of the incident?” Alicia Andrews, the chair of the Oklahoma Democratic Party, told The Guardian.
“As a Black woman who lives in Tulsa, those remarks hit particularly hard and close to home,” she added.
“Absolutely the race massacre is tied to race, that’s why it’s called the Tulsa Race Massacre, state Rep. Regina Goodwin (D) told MSNBC. “Racist white mobs came in and murdered Black folks.”
During the massacre, which took place in an affluent Black neighborhood in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in 1921, a mob of white people attacked people, homes and businesses in one of the deadliest racially motivated attacks in U.S. history. The mob is believed to have killed around 300 people.
As Walters’s words were going viral, an Oklahoma state judge rejected a lawsuit from a group of survivors of the massacre, who sought reparations from the city over inaction from officials as the attacks were taking place.
Tulsa County District Court Judge Caroline Wall dismissed a lawsuit from victims of the massacre on Friday, with prejudice, meaning that they cannot file another lawsuit seeking different forms of reparations in the future. The lawsuit from three individuals who lived through the event — Lessie Benningfield Randle, 108, Viola Fletcher, 109, and Hughes Van Ellis, 102 — alleged that the city of Tulsa failed to stop the white mob from attacking Black people and their neighborhood, essentially breaking public nuisance laws in the process.
The suit had sought to have the city provide a detailed account of all the wealth and property that had been lost or stolen during the attack. It also sought the construction of a hospital in north Tulsa, and the creation of a Tulsa Massacre Victims Compensation Fund.
Attorneys for the survivors of the attack said they would appeal the ruling.
“Black Americans, especially Black Tulsans, carry the weight of intergenerational racial trauma day in and day out — a weight they cannot relinquish or cavalierly dismiss,” said one of their lawyers, Sara Solfanelli. “The dismissal of this case is just one more example of how America’s, including Tulsa’s, legacy is disproportionately and unjustly borne by the Black community.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.