Washington – Responding to his insurgent campaign's first crisis, Herman Cain was upbeat and defiant. “To quote my chief of staff and all the people around this country, 'Let Herman be Herman,'” he said Monday. “And Herman is gonna stay Herman.”
I was afraid of that.
Cain's policy positions range from the ignorant to the unworkable to the just plain goofy — and yet he is running first or second in most polls for the Republican presidential nomination. He trumpets his utter lack of government experience as a selling point and boasts of not knowing foreign leaders' names. If through some bizarre series of events he were actually elected president, the result would surely be an unmitigated disaster.
It's not yet clear whether this remote possibility has been made even more unlikely by reports — first published Sunday night by Politico — that Cain faced allegations of sexual harassment from two female employees when he headed the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s.
After some initial fumbling by Cain's campaign, in which various aides attempted to issue non-denial denials, the candidate himself went on Fox News to declare that “I have never sexually harassed anyone.” He acknowledged having been “falsely accused” of harassment when he was at the restaurant association, but said the accusations were “totally baseless and totally false.”
He did not specifically deny the Politico story, however, which reported that the two women both left the association after being given financial settlements and signing agreements not to discuss their allegations. “If the restaurant association did a settlement, I wasn't even aware of it,” Cain said Monday on Fox.
Nor has Cain, to this point, dealt with the reported substance of the allegations. According to Politico, this includes language that the women felt was inappropriate and that made them uncomfortable; and, in one instance, a purported suggestion that one of the women accompany Cain to his hotel suite.
Far-right blowhards immediately played the race card. “Liberals are terrified of Herman Cain,” pundit Ann Coulter said. “He is a strong, conservative black man. … They are terrified of strong, conservative black men.” Rush Limbaugh said Cain was being sullied by attackers wielding the “ugliest racial stereotypes.” Interesting to hear those two acknowledging the powerful role that race still plays in our society — the first step, intellectually, toward concluding that there's a continuing need for race-based affirmative action. That's what they meant, right?
Um, no. I'm quite sure that the far right's quickness to compare Cain to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas — and to call Cain's present difficulties a second “high-tech lynching” — is just another salvo in the intra-party war Republicans are having.
On one side there's the Republican establishment, which has decided that Mitt Romney is the candidate most likely to defeat President Obama next year, and thus is the party's obvious choice. This faction is personified by Bush-era political guru Karl Rove, whose reaction to the Politico allegations was to criticize the way Cain was handling his response.
On the other side there's the majority of Republicans who aren't sold on Romney and are looking for somebody else — Donald Trump, Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, Herman Cain, anybody. Despite his lack of experience — and his apparent lack of a national campaign staff or strategy — Cain is proving to have as much staying power as any of the others.
At a National Press Club appearance on Monday, Cain was asked whether he thought Politico might have been tipped off about the sexual harassment allegations by one of his rivals for the nomination.
“I told you this bull's-eye on my back has gotten bigger,” Cain replied.
He needs to answer more questions about the alleged harassment. Beyond his categorical denial of wrongdoing, he could call on the National Restaurant Association to relax its confidentiality rules and release records of the two cases — perhaps with names redacted — so voters can come to their own conclusions. Cain said Monday he would not request such action. Why not release as much information as possible, if that will put the issue to rest?
I hope he does, because we're running out of bandwidth. Cain's famous “9-9-9” tax plan would be ruinous. He wants to privatize Social Security. He believes that “extensive foreign policy experience” is not something a president needs, since when he was named chief executive of Godfather's Pizza “I had never made a pizza — but I learned.”
So many reasons to oppose this loopy candidacy, so little time.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy