House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-California) falsely claimed that he never took any action to help overturn the outcome of the 2020 presidential race.
McCarthy made the assertions while responding to reporters’ questions during a press conference on Thursday.
The House minority leader denied that he was attempting to flip Arizona in favor of former President Donald Trump during the overall certification process for the Electoral College earlier this month.
“What I voted on wasn’t to overturn an election, because it wouldn’t. It would not overturn it,” McCarthy claimed.
Close to 150 Republicans in Congress voted against certifying a number of state election results during the certification process that took place on January 6 and 7. McCarthy voted against certifying Arizona’s results, citing erroneous claims of election fraud in that state from former President Donald Trump.
The original plan by some Republicans had called for rejecting results in Arizona, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania. After a mob of Trump loyalists attacked the Capitol that day, forcing the certification process to be delayed, plans were called off to contest two of those four states.
Had Republicans been successful in contesting those results, Biden would have been denied the presidency, and Trump would be serving a second term in office.
McCarthy’s claims that he didn’t seek to overturn the results may be based upon the fact that both houses of Congress would have had to have agreed to decertify election results in order to be successful. As Democrats controlled the House of Representatives, any attempt to change the outcome would have been — and was — rejected.
However, a vote in favor of overturning a state’s result is not any less an attempt to do so simply because it would have been unsuccessful.
The House minority leader was also among 126 congressional Republicans who signed onto an amicus brief encouraging the United States Supreme Court to decertify the four states’ results. The brief requested that the High Court give Republican-controlled legislatures in those places the authority to select electors instead, a move that the court ultimately rejected.
McCarthy also attempted to change the record on his views of the attack on the Capitol itself, stating that he believed Trump wasn’t responsible for what had happened.
“I don’t believe [Trump] provoked, if you listened to what he said at the rally,” McCarthy said during the press conference.
Last week, however, prior to Trump’s impeachment in the House for his role in the attacks, McCarthy had expressed the exact opposite view.
“The President bears responsibility for Wednesday’s attack on Congress by mob rioters,” McCarthy had said at that time.
The California Republican tried to downplay his own role in pushing misinformation that led to the violence on January 6. McCarthy said he was “very consistent” in denouncing the violence, but avoided taking any blame himself.
According to reporting from Talking Points Memo, when asked about his role in stirring up animosities among Trump loyalists, McCarthy refused to directly answer reporters’ questions on the matter.
Earlier in the day, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) indicated that House managers would proceed with presenting evidence at a Senate trial to indict the former president with the single article of impeachment made against him last week.
Pelosi rejected denunciations from several Republicans that were coming to Trump’s defense, as they insisted that an impeachment trial would go against calls for “unity” that Biden was trying to make.
“The [former] president of the United States committed an act of incitement of insurrection,” Pelosi said in response to those claims. “I don’t think it’s very unifying to say, ‘oh, let’s just forget it and move on.'”
Briefly, we wanted to update you on where Truthout stands this month.
To be brutally honest, Truthout is behind on our fundraising goals for the year. There are a lot of reasons why. We’re dealing with broad trends in our industry, trends that have led publications like Vice, BuzzFeed, and National Geographic to make painful cuts. Everyone is feeling the squeeze of inflation. And despite its lasting importance, news readership is declining.
To ensure we stay out of the red by the end of the year, we have a long way to go. Our future is threatened.
We’ve stayed online over two decades thanks to the support of our readers. Because you believe in the power of our work, share our transformative stories, and give to keep us going strong, we know we can make it through this tough moment.
We’ve launched a campaign to raise $42,000 in the next 6 days. Please consider making a donation today.