It may seem like everyone’s online these days, yet 30 percent of Americans still don’t have broadband Internet at home. That’s a lot of people who are disconnected, and statistically, wireless-less Americans tend to be older, poorer and less educated than those who have it.
Now, President Barack Obama wants to bridge this cultural divide by expanding Internet access to the poor. His plan, called ConnectHome, will provide free or low-cost ($10/month) Internet to 275,000 low-income houses in 27 cities around the country.
As with any decision this president makes, Obama’s plan has spawned a lot of criticism. Michael O’Rielly, the FCC Commissioner and a Republican, has previously declared that the Internet is “not a right” for Americans. Basically, this controversy all boils down to whether the Internet should be considered a luxury or a necessity.
I remember a time when the Internet was definitely a luxury. In my early teen years, families in my neighborhood started adding America Online to their home computers and they got to email, Instant Message, and explore the seedy world of chat rooms. I know I thought I “needed” my parents to get AOL, too, so I could stay in better contact with my friends, but at the time, my teachers didn’t even count Internet sites as valid sources for research papers.
However, I’d have trouble calling the Internet a luxury nearly 20 years later. Now, I’d be hard-pressed to name a friend who doesn’t live in a home with a broadband connection. Certainly no millennial I know would be willing to live anywhere long-term without the Internet.
Yes, the Internet is at least part luxury, as the home of nonessentials like Netflix, porn and cat videos on YouTube, but just think of all the tasks that are part of your everyday life now:
- Emailing family members
- Communicating with colleagues
- Searching for jobs
- Online banking
- Paperless billing
- Reading the news
In particular, President Obama wants to see his Internet plan reach at least 200,000 kids who wouldn’t have the Web otherwise. He noted that the Internet is now a prime indicator of what side of the achievement gap a student falls on and that homework is increasingly difficult for students without the Internet in their homes. “If we don’t get these young people the access to what they need to achieve their potential, then it’s our loss; it’s not just their loss,” the president said.
While Obama is trying to spread access to more poor families, a group of liberal superstars are working to make the Internet a little bit more affordable for everyone. This month, Senators Al Franken, Ed Markey, Elizabeth Warren and Barry Sanders penned a letter demanding an investigation into soaring cable and internet prices.
The Internet may no longer be a luxury, but it’s certainly still priced as such. At this point, Internet service providers seem to want to have it both ways. On the one hand, they want Americans to be hooked on their services and make life feel impossible without it. On the other hand, they want to deny that it’s a necessity so they can avoid being labeled a utility subject to additional regulations and even price restrictions.
Navigating through this complicated issue of trying to rein in on broadband providers’ de facto monopolies will probably take years to come, which is why Obama’s plan to expand cheap Internet access to poor communities is beneficial in the meantime.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.