Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Immigrants and Unions Work To Oust Notorious Arizona Sheriff

The u201cAdiu00f3s Arpaiou201d campaign is part of a strategy by the hotel union UNITE HERE to turn around Arizonau2019s anti-worker policies.

Latino workers in the Phoenix area are fighting back against the bullying sheriff of Maricopa County, Joe Arpaio. They’ve registered over 34,000 new voters for the November election.

The “Adiós Arpaio” campaign is part of a strategy by the hotel union UNITE HERE to turn around Arizona’s anti-worker policies, in a right-to-work state where Latino workers have only recently begun to flex their political muscles. Maricopa County contains 60 percent of Arizona’s population

Organizers say they feel a seismic shift in the political landscape. “I’ve never been part of something historic before,” said Lucia Vergara Aguirre, president of UNITE HERE Local 631. The union has been growing, representing workers at the Phoenix airport complex and at several downtown hotels, and has other organizing drives underway.

The campaign could have national importance in drawing the line against politicians who use anti-immigrant rhetoric to gain office. UNITE HERE members have been taking time off to work on the voter registration campaign. Fifty volunteers from the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, along with labor activists from Texas and New Mexico, traveled to Phoenix to bolster the effort.

But a phalanx of Phoenix high school students has formed the backbone of the campaign. They’ve been coming into the union office after school and working four shifts a day on weekends, heading out to register people in grocery stores and on doorsteps, making inroads in a Latino community that has not traditionally registered to vote in high proportions.

“All these students committed because they have the same issue inside, that they can’t stand discrimination against Latinos,” said Carmen Robles, a Tempe High School student who, at 15, leads one of a dozen student voter registration teams. Hers is jokingly called the T Party, for Tempe.

In October, students led a march to Arpaio’s office, bringing moving boxes to suggest he should get busy packing up. The action was courageous because some students have had direct experience with the Maricopa County sheriff’s office. “One of my friends got her dad taken away,” said Robles, who said her mother is undocumented.

“Some people want to join us but still have that fear, that Arpaio is going to mess with us,” she said. “Our determination is bigger than Arpaio.”

Robles easily made the connection between worker rights and the immigration crackdown, explaining that her mother’s job options are limited because of her status—she works at a car wash where she is paid for only a portion of the time she’s at work.

JOE’S GOTTA GO

“Sheriff Joe” made a name for himself by confining prisoners in tents in the desert heat, cutting them back to two meals a day, and declaring himself “America’s Toughest Sheriff.”

But Arpaio’s star may be fading. He has been the target of many investigations, including one where the U.S. Justice Department concluded his office had “a pervasive culture of discriminatory bias against Latinos” directed from the highest levels of the agency.

Always a self-promoter, Arpaio surfaced on the national radar as America’s most anti-immigrant sheriff in 2007, riding a wave of prejudice that crested with Arizona’s hated SB 1070. Signed into law by Republican Governor Jan Brewer in 2010, SB 1070 transforms local police and sheriffs into immigration officers and virtually guarantees racial profiling.

Vergara Aguirre said her members are afraid they’ll be detained simply because they fit the profile of Mexicans or because their English is accented. Some are even afraid to leave work to go home. The visibility of the movement against Arpaio is reducing that fear, she said.

Still, “the level of fear is extraordinary,” said Daria Ovide of the Campaign for Arizona’s Future, a union-funded political action committee working against Arpaio. “You can be detained even if you’re documented because you’re assumed to be undocumented.” And detention means confinement in one of Arpaio’s tents, in all weather.

Arpaio’s constitutional violations were so blatant that in 2011 the federal Department of Homeland Security stripped the sheriff’s office of its authority to identify and detain people simply because they have no papers. It’s unclear that Arpaio’s agency has changed much, though.

LEARNING ABOUT THE UNION

Some unions have stayed out of the Adiós Arpaio campaign, though the Food and Commercial Workers are on board. “Immigration is still a very divisive issue among unions,” said Ovide.

She thinks that’s wrongheaded, since Latinos of any economic status vote better on working people’s issues than even union members who are white do. So it benefits workers of all races to increase Latino voter turnout, she said.

Meanwhile, the high school student volunteers are learning about the union. Vergara Aguirre has found herself explaining to fascinated 17-year-olds how the union works, how she got involved, and what a union contract is. They talk to her about the humiliating, low-paid jobs their parents have, and ask if a union could change that.

“These kids are going to be part of our union,” she predicted.

The sheriff’s race is likely to be close. Anti-Arpaio voters outnumber supporters in the polls, but it’s a three-way race, with a Libertarian candidate in distant third place drawing some votes away from the Democratic challenger.

Arpaio has a formidable campaign budget, since he garners donations from all over the country for his inflammatory actions—he even launched an investigation of President Obama’s birth certificate. And he has support from Phoenix’s suburbs, a largely retired, largely white population.

Vergara Aguirre sees the effort as a long-term strategy. Increased Latino voter turnout can help the union secure better conditions at the city-owned airport, by electing more sympathetic city council members. Looking to the future, Arizona campaigners hope to emulate the mobilization in California that changed the state’s political climate in reaction to the 1994 anti-immigrant Proposition 187.

“If we take Arpaio out of office, that will be a celebration for everyone,” she said, “but if not, next time.

“The next one will be Jan Brewer,” Vergara Aguirre added. “That lady has to go, too.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.