Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Arizona Immigration Law’s Supporters, Opponents Rally Outside Supreme Court

Washington – “Los immigrantes, somos importantes!” protesters chanted Wednesday outside the Supreme Court. Immigrants, we are important. Others carried signs that said, “Exporting illegals = importing jobs for Americans!” Inside the Supreme Court building, the justices heard arguments in a case that could overturn Arizona’s controversial immigration law. The two-year-old law requires local police to … Continued

Washington – “Los immigrantes, somos importantes!” protesters chanted Wednesday outside the Supreme Court. Immigrants, we are important.

Others carried signs that said, “Exporting illegals = importing jobs for Americans!”

Inside the Supreme Court building, the justices heard arguments in a case that could overturn Arizona’s controversial immigration law. The two-year-old law requires local police to determine the residency status of anyone they stop if they suspect the person is an illegal immigrant.

Opponents of the law say it amounts to racial profiling.

“I think it’s offensive that this is how Arizona is being represented in the United States,” said Katie Benton-Cohen, a Georgetown University history professor who’s originally from Tempe, Ariz., where her family has lived for more than 100 years.

“My family’s all in construction. Everybody works with immigrants,” Benton-Cohen said. “My grandfather was fluent in Spanish. His parents were immigrants from Eastern Europe.”

CASA of Maryland, an advocacy group for Central Americans and U.S. natives of Central American origin, made one of the biggest showings outside the court, with nearly a hundred protesters in identical white T-shirts.

Those who support the law also came to rally. The American Council for Immigration Reform set up a podium where proponents of the law spoke. At one point, a woman led a sing-along of “God Bless America.”

“Right now we’ve got millions of Americans out of work, so we can’t afford to support all of these illegals who came here illegally, who are taking up jobs that Americans could be doing now,” said John Balazek, an unemployed steel worker who’s originally from Riverdale, Md.

“They’re overwhelming our culture,” he said. “You can’t even go to the grocery store, because nothing’s in English. I’ve seen the place where I grew up turn into a Third World country.”

Opponents of the law said their presence outside the Supreme Court was about more than staging a protest, it was also a way to draw attention to their own experiences thousands of miles from the Mexican border.

“If I ever go to (the affluent Washington suburb of) Bethesda, there are certain looks,” said Heidi Rosales, a University of Maryland student. “Just going to the grocery store and getting that look like, ‘You’re not supposed to be here. You’re supposed to be in another neighborhood,’ it hurts.”

Rosales is the daughter of a Guatemalan immigrant who crossed the border illegally and cleaned houses in Montgomery County, Md., to support her family. She’s just trying to make a better life for herself, she said.

“The fact is, America is changing. It’s a growing population. But ‘browning,’ as you can call it, it’s not a wrong thing.”

© 2012 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 4 days to add 310 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.