Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Forcing an Island of Peace to Host a Billion-Dollar Military Base

Uncle Sam is wrecking a great deal of South Korea’s top tourist destination.

Back in the spring, an Asian tragedy fleetingly made headlines when an overloaded ferryboat sank on its way to South Korea’s Jeju Island. Nearly 300 people aboard the Sewol ferry perished, mostly children.

We’ve been hearing way less about the tragedy unfolding on the island that was supposed to be their destination.

Jeju, a World Heritage Site and the country’s top tourist attraction, is a picturesque self-governing province located between China and Japan. The verdant island draws tourists from across the globe to admire its world-class coral reefs and stunning volcano. It’s known both as “the Island of Peace” and “the Hawaii of Korea.”

But maybe not for long.

Those beautiful reefs? Unfortunately, they’re in jeopardy thanks to the Pentagon.

The island and its inhabitants are unwilling hosts to a giant, $1-billion naval base currently being built. The construction is wrecking a great deal of Jeju’s stunning natural environment.

Though the base will technically belong to South Korea, it can be commandeered by the United States under the terms of the country’s alliance agreement with Washington. The facility is making way for some 20 warships, several submarines, and up to 8,000 marines. It’s also going to be home to a squadron of U.S.-built Aegis missile interceptors, designed — the Pentagon apparently believes — to take out enemy rockets before they strike a target.

That means Washington should theoretically be able to nuke China, but Beijing won’t be able to nuke us back. Naturally, many residents of Jeju want no part of this fight. So our leaders are setting up similar installations in Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, and other Pacific locales, just to be safe.

Chances are you didn’t know about this. Coverage of this contentious new installation is sporadic, spotty, and largely handled by activists and non-U.S. media outlets.

The U.S.-Korean partnership over this base’s construction is a good example of what foreign policy and military wonks are fond of calling the Obama administration’s “pivot” toward Asia — and away from the Middle East. With the rise of ISIS and other troubles in the Middle East, however, talk of pivoting to Asia is decidedly premature.

Even without the coral dredging, most Jeju islanders just want the foreigners out. Japan ruled them with an iron fist from 1910 to 1945. Then it was (officially) under U.S. occupation, followed by horrific bloodshed during the Korean War. Having foolishly sought greater autonomy after the Japanese departed, the islanders were quickly branded as communists by the South Korean government and suffered from a lengthy scorched earth pogrom.

Today, the islanders against the bases’s construction constitute South Korea’s most formidable opposition force. They run huge protests, block entrance gates, get arrested in droves, serve prison terms, and fast to bring attention to their cause.

All of this turmoil, unfortunately, totally escapes the notice of the U.S. press. Even in the wake of the Sewol tragedy, our media paid attention to the foiled journey and ignored the sunken ship’s destination.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.