President Donald Trump has so far resisted calls for issuing a national “stay-at-home” order for all Americans (with exceptions for essential travels, such as forgetting food or medicine) in order to combat the spread of coronavirus.
On Wednesday, Trump expressed the desire to give governors “flexibility” in their response to the pandemic. By far, most states in the U.S. have implemented stay-at-home orders, but their directives are not uniform. A total of 10 states have not issued such decrees.
Trump’s decision not to make such an order appears to contradict his earlier statements. Earlier in the week, he said that social distancing measures were necessary for all Americans to follow if they wanted to see a faster end to the crisis. “The better you do, the faster this whole nightmare will end,” Trump said on Sunday.
The lack of a national stay-at-home order appears to run counter to the desires of Dr. Anthony Fauci, one of the nation’s top infectious disease experts and the most recognizable member of Trump’s coronavirus task force. Speaking Thursday in an interview on CNN, Fauci was asked whether a national policy, not a state-by-state approach, should be put in place.
“I don’t understand why that’s not happening,” he lamented. “I just don’t understand why we’re not doing that. We really should be,” Fauci said.
Fauci, who serves as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, added that he recognized there was a “states’ rights” argument in the whole matter, adding it wasn’t something that he wanted “to get into.”
A vast majority of the American populace agrees with Fauci’s assessments. According to a Morning Consult poll conducted last week, 74 percent of Americans support a national quarantine order, while less than 20 percent oppose the idea.
The support for a national stay-at-home order from the president transcends party lines, with 72 percent of Republicans agreeing that Trump should issue one in order to stop the spread of COVID-19. Only a quarter of Republican voters opposed such an order.
There are questions as to whether a stay-at-home mandate would be lawful at all, with a number of legal scholars arguing that it would violate tenets set forth in the Constitution. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention believes that such orders are constitutional, based on the Commerce Clause, but many view those arguments as being murky, at best.
Notably, all 10 states that haven’t produced stay-at-home orders went to Trump in the 2016 election.
With most states in the nation already under such orders, right now 90 percent of the population is currently under a stay-at-home mandate. But with 10 percent not subject to these kinds of restrictions, it makes it more difficult to “flatten the curve” to alleviate pressures placed on healthcare workers at the frontline of the crisis.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.