President Donald Trump has so far resisted calls for issuing a national “stay-at-home” order for all Americans (with exceptions for essential travels, such as forgetting food or medicine) in order to combat the spread of coronavirus.
On Wednesday, Trump expressed the desire to give governors “flexibility” in their response to the pandemic. By far, most states in the U.S. have implemented stay-at-home orders, but their directives are not uniform. A total of 10 states have not issued such decrees.
Trump’s decision not to make such an order appears to contradict his earlier statements. Earlier in the week, he said that social distancing measures were necessary for all Americans to follow if they wanted to see a faster end to the crisis. “The better you do, the faster this whole nightmare will end,” Trump said on Sunday.
The lack of a national stay-at-home order appears to run counter to the desires of Dr. Anthony Fauci, one of the nation’s top infectious disease experts and the most recognizable member of Trump’s coronavirus task force. Speaking Thursday in an interview on CNN, Fauci was asked whether a national policy, not a state-by-state approach, should be put in place.
“I don’t understand why that’s not happening,” he lamented. “I just don’t understand why we’re not doing that. We really should be,” Fauci said.
Fauci, who serves as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, added that he recognized there was a “states’ rights” argument in the whole matter, adding it wasn’t something that he wanted “to get into.”
A vast majority of the American populace agrees with Fauci’s assessments. According to a Morning Consult poll conducted last week, 74 percent of Americans support a national quarantine order, while less than 20 percent oppose the idea.
The support for a national stay-at-home order from the president transcends party lines, with 72 percent of Republicans agreeing that Trump should issue one in order to stop the spread of COVID-19. Only a quarter of Republican voters opposed such an order.
There are questions as to whether a stay-at-home mandate would be lawful at all, with a number of legal scholars arguing that it would violate tenets set forth in the Constitution. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention believes that such orders are constitutional, based on the Commerce Clause, but many view those arguments as being murky, at best.
Notably, all 10 states that haven’t produced stay-at-home orders went to Trump in the 2016 election.
With most states in the nation already under such orders, right now 90 percent of the population is currently under a stay-at-home mandate. But with 10 percent not subject to these kinds of restrictions, it makes it more difficult to “flatten the curve” to alleviate pressures placed on healthcare workers at the frontline of the crisis.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 500 new monthly donors in the next 10 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy