Republican Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia said Thursday that keeping in place the current 21% corporate tax rate is a “non-negotiable red line” in infrastructure negotiations, a position that Democratic lawmakers rejected as “completely unreasonable” as they face pressure from progressives to forge ahead without the GOP.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), chair of the Senate Finance Committee, said in a statement Thursday that “corporations have never contributed less to federal revenues than they do now” thanks in large part to the 2017 Republican tax cuts, which slashed the corporate rate from 35% to 21%.
“Our analysis of CBO data shows corporate revenue is down nearly 40% from the 21st century average since Republicans’ tax giveaway,” said Wyden. “In 2018, the United States was dead last among OECD countries in how much corporate tax revenue it collected as a share of GDP.”
“Republicans’ insistence that the most profitable companies in the world shouldn’t contribute a single penny to investments in roads, schools, and our clean-energy future is simply not acceptable,” the Oregon Democrat added.
Capito is part of a 20-member bipartisan group of senators that is aiming to construct an alternative to President Joe Biden’s $2.3 trillion infrastructure proposal, but the GOP has yet to publicly offer any concrete suggestions — a signal, according to some observers, that Republicans are not actually interested in negotiating.
Earlier this week, Capito said an infrastructure package totaling between $600-$800 billion — a dramatic cut to Biden’s opening offer — would be the “sweet spot” for Republicans. Asked to explain why she prefers that range, Capito replied: “It’s just a ballpark figure. It doesn’t — it may not even be that much. I don’t know. I just kind of threw that out as a talking point.”
“This is such a silly process,” Adam Jentleson, a former Senate staffer, said in response to Capito’s comments. “Republicans are unserious and there is simply no reason for Democrats to cut the bill by 60% or more. There’s a point where bipartisanship starts becoming entirely about vanity and posturing.”
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W. Va.) says Republican senators will oppose any effort to raise the corporate tax rate to pay for infrastructure:
“I think that’s a non-negotiable red line.” pic.twitter.com/hYWXisKWGW
— JM Rieger (@RiegerReport) April 15, 2021
If Senate Democrats refuse to heed growing calls to eliminate the 60-vote legislative filibuster, they will need to win over at least 10 Republicans or use the restrictive budget reconciliation process to pass an infrastructure package.
Following Capito’s remarks on Thursday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — chair of the Senate Budget Committee — told HuffPost that he believes “Democrats have finally caught on that we’re not going to be negotiating forever.”
“If Republicans are serious, I’d love to hear their ideas,” said Sanders. “If they’re not, we’ll have to move along.”
Despite Republicans’ vocal dismissals of his infrastructure proposal and refusal to entertain any corporate tax increases, Biden has publicly remained committed to pursuing compromise. Ahead of a meeting with a bipartisan group of lawmakers on Monday, the president said that he is “prepared to negotiate as to the extent of the infrastructure project, as well as how we pay for it.”
While corporate tax hikes are anathema to big business-friendly Republicans, they are broadly popular with the U.S. public. According to a Morning Consult poll released last week, nearly two-thirds of U.S. voters support raising corporate taxes to fund Biden’s infrastructure proposal.
More Than 3 in 5 Voters Support Corporate Tax Hike to Fund Biden’s Infrastructure Plan https://t.co/RIvPCyJ5nA via @byclairew pic.twitter.com/6oZXFwXfKf
— Morning Consult (@MorningConsult) April 7, 2021
Progressive lawmakers in the House and Senate, meanwhile, are pushing Biden and congressional Democrats to pursue a much more sweeping package that includes major investments in core infrastructure and climate as well as caregiving and other priorities.
“It’s time to go big and it’s time to go bold, and enact these as part of a single, ambitious package,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in a statement last week, countering a push by some centrist Democrats to split the plan into two separate bills.
“We agree that it’s time for transformative change,” said Jayapal, “and we look forward to working with the Biden administration to expand on their proposal and ensure that the American Jobs Plan goes big to truly meet the needs of the public.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy