Skip to content Skip to footer

Democratic and Republican Lawmakers Speak Out Against Afghanistan Troop Surge

President Obama will announce his intention Tuesday evening to send a significant and expedited troop increase to Afghanistan. Liberal Democrats have shown strong and at times bipartisan opposition to sending another 30,000 US troops to battle, which a senior administration official said will be complete by next summer. Sen. Jim McGovern, (D-Massachusetts), said Tuesday that he believes a troop escalation is the wrong move, and could have serious consequences.

President Obama will announce his intention Tuesday evening to send a significant and expedited troop increase to Afghanistan. Liberal Democrats have shown strong and at times bipartisan opposition to sending another 30,000 US troops to battle, which a senior administration official said will be complete by next summer.

Sen. Jim McGovern, (D-Massachusetts), said Tuesday that he believes a troop escalation is the wrong move, and could have serious consequences.

“I just don’t see how increasing our military footprint in Afghanistan is the right thing to do. The Karzai government is corrupt and incompetent. The original use-of-force authorization in 2001 was targeted at Al Qaeda, which has moved to Pakistan.,” he said. “And we are spending billions and billions in borrowed taxpayer money to finance this effort. I would strongly urge the President to reconsider.”

McGovern, Sen. Russ Feingold, (D-Wisconsin), and Rep. Walter Jones, (R-North Carolina), have been part of the bipartisan effort to oppose the increase, which has a projected price tag of more then $30 billion, or $1 million per soldier.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, (D-Vermont), a long-time critic of the plan to send more troops to the region, said, “Where is the rest of the world standing with us on this issue? Why is it just the taxpayers of this country and our very brave soldiers having to bear all of the burden?”

Sen. Barney Frank, (D-Massachusetts), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said the only way to continue to finance the war in Afghanistan at this rate is a graduated income.

“It’s important for people to understand how these wars are adding to our deficits,” Frank said.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich, (D-Ohio),asked: “Why is it we have finite resources for healthcare but infinite resources for war?”

Other legislators, such as Lynn Woolsey (D-California), were not surprised by Obama’s failure to deliver on many of the left’s key issues. “I didn’t expect him to be a progressive, so personally, I’m not surprised.”

Obama will detail his plan Tuesday in a primetime address from the US Military Academy at West Point, NY, Tuesday

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.