Skip to content Skip to footer

Conservative Groups Sue to Block Forgiveness for 800,000 Student Loan Borrowers

A conservative court also blocked relief for students who were defrauded by universities this week.

Student debt relief activists participate in a rally as they march from the U.S. Supreme Court to the White House on June 30, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

A pair of right-wing groups has filed a lawsuit seeking to block the Biden administration’s latest plan to “fix” a key student debt forgiveness program and block 800,000 borrowers from receiving relief.

On Friday, the New Civil Liberties Alliance filed a lawsuit in Michigan on behalf of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy and the Cato Institute, two conservative groups with a history of fighting for right-wing causes. The groups argue that the Department of Education has overstepped its authority in canceling student debt for borrowers in its plan announced last month.

The plan was meant to deliver relief to borrowers under income-driven repayment (IDR), which is supposed to provide relief to people who have paid their student loans for 20 to 25 years but which has largely failed to do so for its 25 years of existence. The Education Department aimed to correct “historical inaccuracies” in how payments were counted — or miscounted — under IDR.

Officials said the plan would deliver $39 billion in relief to over 800,000 borrowers, or about $49,000 of relief per debtor on average.

The agency said in a statement that the lawsuit is “a desperate attempt from right wing special interests to keep hundreds of thousands of borrowers in debt,” per the Associated Press.

“We are not going to back down or give an inch when it comes to defending working families,” the agency continued.

The administration touted the plan shortly after the Supreme Court struck down Biden’s plan for broad-based student debt forgiveness of up to $20,000 for borrowers, relying on a fringe, far right argument that federal regulators only have the authority to make rules explicitly spelled out by Congress. Student debt advocates said that, in reality, the Supreme Court is granting itself power to legislate from the bench.

The new plan is a crucial show of the administration’s commitment to its new student debt relief plan following the Supreme Court decision, which relies heavily on an updated version of IDR. If it’s struck down by courts, it could also deal a major blow to the future of student debt relief under Biden.

The groups suing over the plan have deep ties within the right. The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is a member of the State Policy Network, a far right network of think tanks that pushes for right-wing policies at the state level across the nation with funding from sources like the DeVos and Koch families. Meanwhile, the Cato Institute is a libertarian group founded by Charles Koch that has long been involved in right-wing lobbying and dark money efforts.

The lawsuit is part of a wide-reaching campaign from the right to seemingly block any form of student debt relief for any borrowers.

On Monday, a conservative federal court temporarily blocked relief for students who have been defrauded by schools in response to an appeal from trade group Career Colleges & Schools of Texas (CCST). The group sued last year after the administration issued a rule to provide relief to schools that had misled students.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.