The White House has released a statement reiterating its support for gender-affirming care for transgender youth after an official was met with backlash last week for suggesting that the Biden administration supported some restrictions on such care.
A Biden spokesperson, in email communications with The 19th, said last week that the administration supports gender-affirming care for trans youth in almost all regards, except when it comes to surgery.
“These are deeply personal decisions and we believe these surgeries should be limited to adults,” the spokesperson told the publication last week. “We continue to support gender-affirming care for minors, which represents a continuum of care, and respect the role of parents, families, and doctors in these decisions.”
Notably, surgical treatment is not the most common form of gender-affirming care, which often consists of therapy and sometimes medical treatment in the form of puberty blockers or hormones. However, when doctors determine that surgery is needed in conjunction with patients and their family members, such treatment can be highly beneficial to those who receive it.
Opponents of such treatment, and the rights of transgender youth in general, have crafted many lines of attack against gender-affirming care on the basis that these surgeries happen frequently and result in detrimental, life-altering outcomes.
In fact, the opposite is true: surveys of transgender youth who receive the most common form of surgery as part of their treatment — male chest reconstruction, commonly called “top surgery” — consistently show that it has had a positive outcome in their lives, with little to no regret recorded years afterward.
Anti-trans activists have also peddled false claims that youth are undergoing genital surgery on a widespread scale. However, such surgeries are extremely rare, and are only performed on older trans teens in dire situations in which such treatment is considered lifesaving.
Many medical groups have stated unequivocally that barring surgery for transgender youth, or enforcing overly strict age limits for such treatments, unnecessarily prevents doctors, their patients and their families from seeking care options that could be beneficial. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), for example, has refused to promote minimum ages for these treatments, “to reflect that one-size-fits-all health care models, especially transgender care, are not accurate or appropriate for every individual person.”
“The listing of ages would lead to further limitations to care by creating or reinforcing arbitrary boundaries to care and/or by ignoring possible contributing health factors including mental health, family support, or other individual health needs,” the organization also said.
In response to the Biden administration’s statement last week, several advocates for transgender youth spoke out, demanding clarification from the White House on the administration’s commitment to protecting trans health care.
“It’s angering and disheartening that the Biden Administration would choose to disregard the needs of transgender young people and decades of clinical research at a time when transgender health and rights are under attack across the country,” said Louie Ortiz-Fonseca, Director of LGBTQ Health & Rights at Advocates for Youth.
Added Ortiz-Fonseca:
Transgender young people must be able to be themselves and make the best decisions for their bodies and their futures — and to know that adults in power have their back. We urge the Biden Administration to join us in working with, not against transgender youth and their families to ensure every young person has the lifesaving gender-affirming care they need.
In a letter coordinated by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and a number of other LGBTQ advocacy groups, organizations similarly condemned the statement from the administration last week.
“No parent should ever be put in the position where they and their doctor agree on one course of action for their children, supported by the overwhelming majority of medical experts, but the government forbids it,” that letter said.
In response to the backlash, another administration official sought to clear up the statement from last week, emphasizing on Monday that the Biden White House would continue defending access to all types of gender-affirming care for trans youth.
“We continue to fight state and national bans on gender-affirming care, which represents a continuum of care, and respect the role of parents, families, and doctors — not politicians — in these decisions,” read a statement from Neera Tanden, director of the White House Domestic Policy Council.
“Gender-affirming surgeries are typically reserved for adults, and we believe they should be,” Tanden went on.
Although the statement continued to press the idea that gender-affirming surgeries should generally be reserved for adults, it clarified that the administration wouldn’t seek to restrict youth surgeries when needed.
HRC President Kelly Robinson responded to the new statement positively.
“We appreciate that the administration has clarified that its position on healthcare for the transgender community has not changed — that it opposes any and all bans on access to care and will continue to fight these bans both in the courts and at the legislative level,” Robinson said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.