Skip to content Skip to footer

Climate Change: When It’s All in the Family

Could heartfelt pleas from family members move the people who run the world to an urgent response to our climate crisis?

Picture a day when the world’s most-watched video features a senior oil executive on a stage with his family at one of the popular TED community-conversation events, saying, “For years, my kids have told me the work I do threatens their futures. I didn’t pay much attention. Now I realize they’re right. I see the long-term danger of overloading our air with carbon dioxide. Most of our underground reserves can’t ever be used. I want to stay at my company and help find a way out.”

How might that moment arrive?

Last year we got a preview, when the Rockefeller family stunned the media and markets by announcing it will sell all its investments in coal and tar sands. Rockefeller Brothers Fund President Steven Heintz invoked the family’s moral responsibility, then summoned up founding father John D., saying, “I’m convinced that if he were alive today – he was an innovative, forward-looking businessman – he would recognize that the opportunity in the future is clean energy technology, and he’d be leading the business charge to get us to that economy.”

Family influence isn’t new. Back in the 1930s, when Henry Ford disagreed with his only son Edsel, then president of Ford Motor Co., and wouldn’t negotiate with unions, Henry’s wife Clara’s Lysistrata moment turned the tide. She threatened to leave him. Henry said, “What could I do?”

I tried it in my family. Growing up, hearing my father cough his lungs out every morning, I pleaded with him to stop smoking – for his sake and mine. I wanted to believe that I, his son, could reach him.

Could heartfelt pleas from family members move the people who run the world to an urgent response to our climate crisis? This goes way beyond hat-tips by people invoking their grandchildren (or now, as they realize we’re already experiencing climate change, citing their children’s futures). It’s a reverse commute: family members influencing how their leader-parents think.

That’s what happened to South Carolina U.S. Rep. Bob Inglis from “perhaps the reddest district in the reddest state.” In a TEDx video he says his son Robert, on turning 18, told him “Dad, I’ll vote for you. But you’re going to clean up your act on the environment.” He explains, “I had this new constituency: my son, his four sisters, his mother, all agreed. And all of them could change the locks on the doors.” After losing re-election in 2011, Inglis founded RepublicEn to involve conservatives as “energy optimists and climate realists.”

It’s hard to imagine getting the ear of leaders of the oil, gas and coal industries. After all, as the writer Upton Sinclair famously said, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” Yet given how quickly we need to change so much, we need buy-in from at least some leaders of the world’s wealthiest industry.

I’ve met oil executives who agree that climate change is happening, and that their industry is a major cause. Still, despite all they know, they find a way to sleep at night, and not worry about their families’ futures. One vice president recently told me he believes we soon can affordably capture and bury carbon dioxide. Most analysts say if this techno-fix can ever be done at global scale, even from coal-fired power plants, it will come too late.

Among people who recognize that catastrophic climate change will threaten our freedom to live, the families and friends of movers and shakers have a unique opportunity. They can spur what may have already begun. Which spouses are already talking to their partners? How many kids are asking their parents tough questions? Who will move the first industry CEO to come out on climate change – perhaps alongside a senator from a mining or drilling state, both surrounded by their families?

If you’re eager to act on climate change, I ask you to engage with people whose opinions and behavior you might affect. And, especially if you are one or two degrees of separation from the families of powerful, influential people, consider enlisting them. What a difference they could make, for their place in global history and for all our futures!

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.