Campaigners for an LGBQT-inclusive census, including Laverne Cox, faced disappointment this week, as the agency announced that it won’t ask questions about sexual orientation and gender identity in the 2020 census. This comes as a huge blow to the fight for LGBQT equality, especially because demographic data can be a major tool for social change.
The census is pretty amazing, when you think about it. This national effort aims to count each person in America every ten years, and to collect key demographic data through the American Community Survey. Information from the census can help to determine political districts, fund social programs and understand the makeup of society. Organizations of all kinds rely on census data because it’s highly accurate, detailed and old — the census has been in effect since 1790!
Prior to every census, the Census Bureau must provide Congress with a list of demographic topics, describing the data that the agency intends to collect. An initial list of questions for 2020 included sexual orientation and gender identity, but the agency went back on that decision, saying there was no “statutory or regulatory need” to collect the information.
The move has some crying foul and claiming that the Trump Administration had a hand in the decision — though there’s no evidence to confirm or deny the allegation.
LGBQT activists have pushed the Census Bureau to collect data because they want to be able to answer questions about the demographic makeup of their community with a high degree of accuracy.
And that starts with the most basic: How many LGBQT people are there in America, really? They also want the opportunity to gain a detailed picture of a very diverse community.
How many trans Latinas are there in California? How many black gay men live in Minnesota? How many bisexuals call Texas home? How many trans elders live in the United States? How many Mississippi lesbians live in poverty? These are all questions that individual organizations hope to answer using a variety of demographic tools, but the census could be definitive.
Having a wealth of demographic data on the LGBQT community would be a valuable tool for activists and organizers, but also — theoretically — government agencies. When the Obama administration signaled an interest in tracking and defending the rights of the LGBQT community, for example, this data would have been incredibly helpful. It could also have aided agencies in understanding the needs of the populations they serve with much more accuracy.
It can also be incredibly validating to see your community included in the decennial count of America’s residents. When you see a spot on your census form that recognizes you, it’s empowering. It sends a signal to society as well — an especially important action at a time when LGBQT rights are under threat.
Erasing LGBQT people from demographic data doesn’t make the community disappear, and the push for a more inclusive census will continue. One way to support this initiative is by contacting your legislators and asking them to keep up the pressure.
Regardless of gender, orientation or political beliefs, it’s incredibly valuable to talk about the demographics of the LGBQT population — and statistics collected by a neutral third party with a mandate to count everyone are pretty much the gold standard of data.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.