The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly altered its guidelines on who should get tested for coronavirus, giving very little reasoning for the sudden change.
For the past several weeks, the CDC has encouraged individuals who had come into contact with others who had tested positive for COVID-19 to get tested themselves, even if they were not showing symptoms of the disease.
In an interview with ABC News last month, CDC Director Robert Redfield emphasized that Americans should get tested if they thought there was even a remote possibility of infection.
“Anyone who thinks they may be infected — independent of symptoms — should get a test,” he said.
But the CDC’s policy was updated this week, removing that concern as a reason why someone should seek a test. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) indicated the change came from an “emphasis on testing individuals for post clinical and/or public health reasons.”
“CDC recommends the decision to be tested should be one made in collaboration with public health officials or your health care provider based on individual circumstances and the status of community spread,” a statement from HHS said.
Although a statement from an HHS official suggested that the change had been made to “reflect current evidence and best public health practices,” the agency was not clear on what the new evidence was that necessitated creating new guidelines. Additionally, a separate health official within the federal government told CNN that the change came about due to pressure from the White House.
“It’s coming from the top down,” that individual said.
President Trump has indeed argued at various points this summer in favor of the need to reduce the volume of tests being conducted for coronavirus, wrongly asserting that higher testing numbers were leading to the perception that the disease was more prevalent than it really was.
“When you do testing to that extent, you’re going to find more people. You’re going to find more cases. So I said to my people, slow the testing down please,” Trump said at a rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in June, for example.
Many were alarmed by the sudden change this week in the CDC’s policy regarding testing. “This is potentially dangerous,” infectious disease physician Krutika Kuppalli said to The New York Times.
“You’re not looking for a lot of people who are potential spreaders of disease,” Kuppalli added. “I feel like this is going to make things worse.”
Coronavirus can spread from asymptomatic carriers of the disease to others, potentially leading to infections with serious symptoms requiring hospitalization. The CDC estimates that 40 percent of individuals who have contracted COVID-19 are asymptomatic, and that individuals exhibiting no signs of the disease have a 75 percent chance of spreading it to someone else.
As of Wednesday afternoon, more than 5.9 million cases of coronavirus have been identified since the start of the pandemic in the U.S., with nearly 183,000 Americans having died from the disease so far.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy