Skip to content Skip to footer

Brazil Moves to Cut Amazon Conservation Units by 1.2 Million Hectares

Brazil seeks drastic reduction in Amazon conservation to allow private land ownership, agriculture, and logging on protected land.

The Brazilian Congress is poised to slash the size of existing conservation units, removing federal protection from vast swaths of Amazon rainforest in Pará state. (Photo: Rhett A. Butler)

With Brazil in political turmoil, the bancada ruralista agribusiness lobby that dominates Congress has quietly set in motion measures to dismember some of the country’s most important conservation units in the eastern section of the Amazon basin.

The move occurs at a time when the country is fully focused on the Supreme Court’s recently announced plans to investigate corruption allegations made against leading politicians, including eight of President Temer’s ministers.

Congressmen have introduced amendments to two key provisional measures — MP 756/2016 and MP 758/2016 — which would remove conservation protection from by 1.2 million hectares (2,965,252 acres) of forest.

Some of the affected units have received significant funding from foreign donors, including the European Union and the World Bank.

On 11 April, a Congressional commission approved an amendment to MP 756 to reduce the area of the Jamanxim Flona (National Forest) by 480,000 hectares — over a third of the unit’s current total area of 1.3 million hectares. The amendment also cut the area the Nascentes da Serra do Cachimbo Biological Reserve by half — a 180,000 hectare reduction. Both conservation units are in the state of Pará.

The dismembered tracts will have their conservation status changed so that they become Areas of Environmental Protection (APAs). Private ownership of land is permitted within an APA, as is agriculture and forest felling.

The lands removed from the conservation units would be reclassified as Areas of Environmental Protection (APAs), where private land ownership, agriculture and forest clearing is allowed. (Photo: Sue Branford)The lands removed from the conservation units would be reclassified as Areas of Environmental Protection (APAs), where private land ownership, agriculture and forest clearing is allowed. (Photo: Sue Branford)

The federal deputy, José Priante, the rapporteur for MP 756, justified the measure, saying: “By making an area an APA, we are merely choosing a form of conservation that makes it possible to mediate conflicts.” He contended that the affected areas already had farmers living within them when the land was included within the conservation units, and that the APA reclassification protected the farmers’ interests.

However, a study carried out by the Chico Mendes Institute for Conservation and Biodiversity (ICMBio), which administers federal conservation units, found that two-thirds of the farmers who had cleared forest within the Jamanxim Flona had moved into the area after it was turned into a conservation unit — meaning that they were illegally exploiting public lands.

Opposition federal deputy Nilto Tatto criticized the MP, saying that it sent a clear message that “crime pays” and that “it’s worth invading conservation units.”

While Brazil’s environmental agencies were busy gathering signatures for a protest letter against MP 756, they were hit by another blow. On the following day, in a session that lasted seven minutes, the same Congressional commission approved amendments to MP 758, whereby the National Park of Jamanxin is to lose half its area (344,000 hectares), and the Itaituba II National Forest is to lose well over a third of its protected land (169,000 hectares). The dismembered areas will be turned into APAs.

The amendments moving their way through Congress, which are likely to be approved, would open large areas of Amazon rainforest to agriculture. (Photo: Rhett A. Butler)The amendments moving their way through Congress, which are likely to be approved, would open large areas of Amazon rainforest to agriculture. (Photo: Rhett A. Butler)

The reduction in Amazon conservation units by 1.2 million hectares in total, an area almost as large as Puerto Rico, is likely to be received with consternation by foreign funders.

Brazil’s ministry of the environment has a program called ARPA (the Amazonia Protected Areas Program), which was created to strengthen conservation units in the Amazon. Described as “the planet’s greatest program for tropical forest conservation,” its first phase has a budget of US$125.6 million, largely provided by the World Bank’s Global Environment Facility, Germany’s Development Bank (KfW) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF).

Part of this funding goes to the National Park of Jamanxim and to the Nascentes da Serra do Cachimbo Biological Reserve, both of which are seeing serious losses in area.

The European Union has also provided funding for the Jamanxim and the Itaituba II National Forests through various projects, while the German Development Bank (KfW) has separately provided considerable resources for the forests.

The provisional measures (MPs) will now go for approval to the lower Chamber of Deputies and then to the Senate. Both measures must be approved by the end of May or lose validity.

Considering the strength of the agribusiness lobby, passage of the amendments seems very likely, but, with the scale of the current political crisis in Brazil, little is predictable. Many workers, including the police, are deeply unhappy with the government’s pension reforms, with mass protests happening around the country.

Opposition federal deputy Nilto Tatto criticized the congressional measures, saying they convey a message that crime pays and that it's worth invading conservation units. Critics like Tatto assert that the dismemberment of Amazon conservation units is largely a means of legitimizing the claims of wealthy land thieves who have long been illegally operating within the units. (Photo: Rhett A. Butler)Opposition federal deputy Nilto Tatto criticized the congressional measures, saying they convey a message that “crime pays” and that “it’s worth invading conservation units.” Critics like Tatto assert that the dismemberment of Amazon conservation units is largely a means of legitimizing the claims of wealthy land thieves who have long been illegally operating within the units. (Photo: Rhett A. Butler)

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 231 new monthly donors in the next 2 days.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy