Prominent U.S. lawmakers said Sunday that Jair Bolsonaro should not be given safe harbor in Florida after his supporters — animated by the far-right former president’s election lies — launched a massive attack on Brazil’s main government buildings, an assault that came a week after leftist President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was inaugurated.
“Two years ago our Capitol was attacked by fanatics, now we are watching it happen in Brazil,” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said Sunday evening after thousands of Bolsonaro supporters stormed and ransacked Brazil’s presidential palace, Congress, and Supreme Court.
“Solidarity with Lula and the Brazilian people,” Omar continued. “Democracies around the world must stand united to condemn this attack on democracy. Bolsonaro should not be given refuge in Florida.”
Just two days before his term ended and he was set to relinquish power to Lula following his failed bid to overturn the October election results, Bolsonaro flew to Orlando, Florida “with plans to stay for at least a month,” The New York Times reported.
According to the Times, Bolsonaro — an ally of former U.S. President Donald Trump — has been “living in a rented house owned by a professional mixed martial arts fighter a few miles from Disney World.” The Washington Post reported last month that “days after Bolsonaro’s loss, allies met with Trump aides in the United States to discuss next steps. His son Eduardo, a Brazilian congressman, met Trump at Mar-a-Lago [in November] in Palm Beach, Florida.”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said Sunday that “the U.S. must cease granting refuge to Bolsonaro in Florida.”
“We must stand in solidarity with Lula’s democratically elected government,” the New York Democrat added.
In an appearance on CNN, Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) joined his colleagues in arguing that “Bolsonaro should not be in Florida.”
“The United States should not be a refuge for this authoritarian who has inspired domestic terrorism in Brazil,” said Castro. “He should be sent back to Brazil.”
Citing current and former U.S. officials, Reuters reported late Sunday that “the most immediate threat to Bolsonaro would come if his U.S. visa were revoked.”
“A U.S. consular official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Bolsonaro had almost certainly entered on an A-1 visa, which are reserved for heads of state. A second source, a senior former U.S. diplomat, also believed it was almost certain that Bolsonaro had entered on an A-1,” the outlet noted. “Normally the A-1 is canceled after the recipient leaves office. But with Bolsonaro having left Brazil and entered the United States before his term ended, the official suspected his A-1 is still active.”
In a Twitter post, U.S. President Joe Biden condemned the attack and pledged that “Brazil’s democratic institutions have our full support.”
“The will of the Brazilian people must not be undermined. I look forward to continuing to work with Lula,” the president added, not mentioning Bolsonaro’s presence in the U.S.
Tensions in Brazil have been elevated since Lula’s victory over Bolsonaro, who once declared that “only God” will oust him from the presidency.
“I have three alternatives for my future: being arrested, killed, or victory,” the former president said in August.
Since Bolsonaro’s defeat, his loyalists have rallied in support of a military coup, attempted to storm police headquarters in the nation’s capital, and plotted to plant explosives near Lula’s inauguration site with the goal of preventing the peaceful transfer of power.
Brazilian authorities ultimately secured the government buildings late Sunday and arrested around 400 Bolsonaro supporters, but not before they were able to inflict significant damage and spark international alarm over the fate of Brazil’s democracy.
Lula, who was in São Paulo at the time of the attack, blamed Bolsonaro for inciting the riot, accusing the former president of “encouraging this via social media.”
“Everybody knows there are various speeches of the ex-president encouraging this,” said Lula, who also lambasted the “incompetence, bad faith, or malice” of the security forces tasked with protecting the government complex from the “vandals and fascists.”
“We are going to find out who the financiers of these vandals who went to Brasília are,” Lula vowed, “and they will all pay with the force of law.”
Flávio Dino, Brazil’s justice minister, wrote on Twitter that “we have all the plates of the buses that brought criminals to Brasília.”
“Many were seized,” he added, “and others will be.”
Unlike mainstream media, we’re not capitulating to Trump.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.