After mocking the idea just two weeks earlier, the Biden White House on Tuesday announced a plan to distribute 500 million free at-home coronavirus tests to households across the U.S. as the administration ramps up its effort to combat the surging Omicron variant, which now accounts for nearly 75% of the nation’s new cases.
According to a fact sheet the White House unveiled Tuesday morning, the administration will soon “purchase a half-billion at-home, rapid tests this winter to be distributed for free to Americans who want them, with the initial delivery starting in January 2022.”
“The administration will stand up a website where Americans can go to get at-home tests delivered to their home — for free,” the fact sheet notes.
The White House also said President Joe Biden will utilize the Defense Production Act to scale up the manufacturing of coronavirus tests to ensure adequate supply as demand surges in response to the spread of Omicron, which is driving a rise in infections across the country. Coronavirus cases in the U.S. are up 20% over the past two weeks and hospitalizations are up 14%, state and local health data shows.
Public health experts and campaigners welcomed the administration’s belated decision to use the apparatus of the federal government to widely distribute free at-home coronavirus tests, an approach that has long been a mainstay of other major nations’ pandemic response efforts.
“Finally they are listening!” tweeted Jeremy Faust, an emergency physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and an instructor at Harvard Medical School.
Uché Blackstock, a physician and health equity advocate, said the administration’s about-face demonstrates that “social media advocacy really does work.”
“Now, if only we could get these tests to folks now as opposed to sometime in January,” Blackstock added.
Earlier this month, the White House faced a wave of criticism over its dismissive response to a reporter’s suggestion that mass-mailing tests could be simpler — and more effective — than a separate administration plan allowing people to seek reimbursement from their private health insurers to cover test costs.
“Why not just make them free and give them out to — and have them available everywhere?” NPR’s Mara Liasson asked during a December 6 press briefing.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki responded sarcastically: “Should we just send one to every American?”
The American Prospect’s David Dayen argued after the administration’s reversal that “the teachable lesson is that the White House can be embarrassed into doing the right thing.”
“And that you don’t need Joe Manchin’s sign-off to produce for the American people,” Dayen added.
As the Washington Post’s Aaron Blake noted in response to Psaki’s comments, “It’s not like sending free tests to everyone is some unthinkable idea. The United Kingdom allows people to mail-order seven tests at a time, free of charge. Singapore has sent not one but six free rapid tests to every household.”
While lamenting that it is long overdue, epidemiologist Michael Mina said he is nevertheless “excited” about the administration’s plan, which will also attempt to increase lagging U.S. vaccination rates by establishing new pop-up clinics across the nation.
“Though to temper expectations — there’s 350 million people in the U.S. and 500 million free tests distributed over a period of months only goes so far,” Mina observed. “Although 500 million across 350 million is not massive per person, this has the ability ensure that this process is in place and the U.S. will have tests when needed beyond Omicron.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.