Republicans in the Arizona state legislature have advanced a bill that would grant property owners the right to shoot and kill anyone who trespasses on their property, so long as they claim they were doing so in self-defense.
House Bill 2843 expands the state’s current “Castle Doctrine” law. That statute allows individuals to shoot and kill any person who breaks into their home. Under the new proposal, however, anyone who walks onto the land of an Arizona property owner could similarly be killed.
The bill is largely seen as a means to allow ranchers and farmers, whose property lines up with the U.S.-Mexico border, to shoot and kill migrants who may be crossing over to seek asylum, unaware that they’re entering private property. Indeed, the bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Justin Heap (R), specifically said the bill was meant to address migrants on people’s properties.
The bill also appears to be a direct response to such a situation. Last year, a 73-year-old rancher named George Alan Kelly shot what he called “warning shots” in the direction of a group of migrants whom he claimed were armed, saying he felt threatened by their presence. Kelly was around 100 yards away from the migrants. One of Kelly’s shots killed Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea; when his body was examined, it was determined that he was unarmed.
The proposal passed the state House earlier this week along party lines by a vote of 31-28. Although the bill has a good chance of passage in the Republican-run state Senate, it’s expected to be vetoed by Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs.
Republicans across the U.S. are pushing forward a slew of xenophobic anti-immigration bills, likely out of a desire to bolster their chances of winning several key races in the 2024 election cycle. However, recent polling shows that most Americans do not list immigration as their top issue at this time, with a Reuters/Ipsos poll published this week showing that the topic is third behind the issues of the economy and threats to democracy.
Americans overall appear to favor at least some immigration policies that treat migrants humanely. While a majority now support cruel and harmful measures like building a border wall, most voters also want to prioritize expanding protections for immigrants in the U.S. as well.
According to a Data for Progress poll published last month, 56 percent of voters say the government should make it easier for migrants to make their case before an immigration judge and to avoid sending asylum seekers back into dangerous situations. In contrast, only 35 percent said migrants should be immediately deported.
Furthermore, the same poll found that 62 percent of voters agreed with eliminating a six-month waiting period for asylum seekers in the U.S. to apply for work authorization. Only 30 percent of voters oppose that idea.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 143 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy