Tel Aviv, Israel – The MV Rachel Corrie, carrying another group of pro-Palestinian activists seeking to challenge the Gaza blockade, sailed toward a possible clash with Israel in the Mediterranean on Friday. But Israel said it had no desire for a fresh confrontation five days after an Israeli commando raid on the “Freedom Flotilla” resulted in skirmishes with activists wielding metal rods, clubs, and knives. Nine activists were killed.
“We have no desire for a confrontation,” read a statement by Israel’s Foreign Ministry, though Israeli leaders said the country would continue to enforce a naval blockade. “We have no desire to board the ship.”
Israel has come under intense international pressure to ease a three-year blockade on Gaza after Israeli navy’s fatal raid on the Mavi Marmara, which was carrying the bulk of the flotilla’s activists and 10,000 tons of aid. A senior US official was quoted in The New York Times as saying not only the US, but Israel, too, has realized that the Gaza blockade has become untenable. Now, as a possible fresh showdown looms, Israel is considering relaxing its restrictions on goods passing into the Gaza Strip.
A senior Israeli official who requested anonymity said that Israel would continue inspect all sea cargo for weapons bound for Hamas, but “we also want to facilitate the transfer of civilian goods to the people of the Gaza Strip. We are currently exploring additional ways to achieve these goals.”
Global Support Strengthens Domestic Critics of Blockade
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterated this week that the blockade is necessary to prevent Iran from establishing a Gaza port through which it can arm Hamas, while opposition leader Tzipi Livni – who was foreign minister when the blockade was imposed in 2007 – says it’s meant to pressure Hamas into renouncing violence.
But the intensified foreign calls against the blockade in the wake of Israel’s flotilla raid has strengthened domestic critics who had already been arguing for a rethink of Israel’s three-year-old policy. Under the policy, only humanitarian food and medical supplies – less than what the UN recommends – are allowed into Gaza.
Yossi Alpher, former adviser to Prime Minister Ehud Barak, says that Monday’s raid takeover is evidence of his claim that Israel needs to define a new strategy for dealing with Gaza’s Hamas-controlled government. He says the blockade is backfiring, and the so-called quartet of peace process mediators – the US, Britain, Russia, and the United Nations – need to realize that.
“I would hope it would bring about the realization among Israel, Egypt, and the Quartet that this policy is counterproductive and a failure,” says Mr. Alpher, co-editor of the Israeli-Palestinian commentary forum Bitterlemons.org. “It’s time to look to see if a more productive strategy can be found.”
“Smarter” Sanctions Needed – Former General
Critics such as Alpher argue that the Gaza blockade strengthens Hamas by putting it in control of an underground economy routed through smuggling tunnels under the Egyptian border, while wreaking havoc on members of Gaza’s middle and working classes. They argue that Hamas has been able to build up military capabilities despite the blockade.
But other say the problem is not sanctions in general, but how they have been applied.
“I think that sanctions should be smarter, and directed at Hamas, rather than so broad and unselective,” says Shlomo Brom, a former general and head of the IDF’s strategic planning branch.
The blockade has been in force since Hamas took over Gaza in June 2007, ousting their secular Fatah rivals in violent clashes. Egypt has largely supported the blockade, keeping its border with the territory mostly closed. But this week it opened its Rafah crossing to humanitarian aid for an indefinite period of time.
Writing in the center-left Haaretz newspaper, columnist Aluf Ben called on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Gaza by sealing its border and stopping the transfer of goods to the coastal strip, shifting responsibility to Egypt.
Unlike mainstream media, we’re not capitulating to Trump.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.