Ten officers. Ninety-nine rounds.
That’s the tally of gunfire that police used to kill 19-year-old Jesus Adolfo Delgado-Duarte on March 6 in San Francisco’s Mission District.
The police killing — the first of 2018 by police in the Mission — has drawn attention because of the overwhelming use of force by officers, who unleashed a barrage of bullets into the trunk of a car that Delgado was allegedly attempting to hide in. Delgado-Duarte was struck by at least 20 bullets of the 99 fired.
Police claim Delgado-Duarte was a suspect in a robbery and that he had fired a gun from inside the trunk of the car. Astonishingly, police opened fire despite the fact that an 18-year-old woman was in the car’s passenger seat at the time — she was miraculously not harmed.
The killing has also drawn attention because of the fact that Delgado-Duarte was a DREAMer — a young undocumented immigrant brought to the US as a small child. Friends told MissionLocal.org that his biggest fear was being deported — and speculated that this was the reason why he tried to hide in the trunk of the car.
Though San Francisco is supposedly a “sanctuary city” for undocumented immigrants, that means little if immigrants can be executed by a police department that operates like an occupying force in the rapidly gentrifying Mission District.
***
A week after the killing, San Francisco Police Chief William Scott, alongside an assortment of city officials, lawyers and officers, attended a community meeting at Cesar Chavez Elementary School. Multiple videos of the shooting were played in an attempt to justify it to grieving family members and a furious community.
The body camera footage was shown to more than 200 people at the meeting, who had turned out after pleas for justice from Delgado-Duarte’s family. Residents reacted with pain and anger — shouting “murderers!” in Spanish — as they watched video clips in which the teenager was gunned down by police.
A Justice for Jesus Adolfo Coalition brought together union members, teachers, health care professionals and members of a local cop watch group to stand up against police violence. As the meeting began, outrage brimmed under weary greetings and murmurs of “Here we are again” by those in attendance.
Community members expressed solidarity with Delgado-Duarte’s family and broke down the systemic nature of the struggle against police violence in their community. Noting that Jesus’ killers were the latest example of police killings involving multiple officers, one woman observed that “[Police] feed on each other’s anger and hatred, and it’s racism.”
Mainstream media outlets largely succumbed to pressure to relay the police narrative of events. They use “copspeak” — passive language and suggestive police jargon — to help “explain” the killing as Delgado-Duarte’s fault.
Headlines focused on the release of the sensational videos — and in most cases completely omitted the outpouring of anger of the hundreds in attendance at the town hall.
Once the police gave the microphone over to community members to speak, a line formed, and people spoke out against police brutality to cheers, roars and chants from the audience.
One officer stationed himself at the front of the line, but retreated within minutes under the collective scorn of the hundreds in attendance.
One of Delgado-Duarte’s family members called out a female officer sitting with Chief Scott for acting bored during the meeting, even as multiple people spoke about the pain her department caused. Anyone who was bored should leave, the family member suggested — and a cacophony of jeers followed the officer out of the room.
Another attendee singled out an official with the Department of Police Accountability for taking no notes, even as the local community related a lengthy list of grievances with the police and gave crucial insight into the way police violence affects the Mission.
***
Those at the meeting weren’t hopeful about the system holding any police or officials accountable for Delgado-Duarte’s killing, suggesting that justice will only come with more direct action.
One suggestion was to make police violence a central issue in San Francisco’s upcoming mayoral election. But one person present explained, “It doesn’t matter who we elect, they’ll turn a blind eye and sweep these murders under the rug.”
Others called for a cut to the police funding. “If you want to get them, cut their funding. Give it to teachers,” said one person.
Many of the speakers and community members present had been active in the fight to oust former Chief Greg Suhr following a string of police murders of other Black and Brown San Francisco residents, including Mario Woods, Luis Gongora Pat and Jessica Williams.
Chief Scott, Suhr’s replacement, has so far been a sad excuse for a supposed “reformer.” The same tactics of direct action and mass organizing that led to his predecessor’s ouster may be reborn in the course of collective struggle fighting for justice for Jesus Delgado-Duarte.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.