If the vast majority of the public in the US and the UK doesn’t have a clue about the death toll from the Iraq war, then how can they make an informed decision about the probable consequences of western intervention in Syria or anywhere else?
The default stance of the public is, quite rationally, against foreign military adventures. For reasons that range from moral to pragmatic, people are not easily convinced that a poor country thousands of miles way needs to be bombed – especially when that country poses no credible threat to them. It takes quite a propaganda campaign to change their minds and the big corporate and state media outlets are reliably there to provide one. It is heartening to see from recent polls that war is as hard a sell as ever. But how much more widespread, and more importantly, how much more intense would public opposition to war be if the vast majority were not completely misinformed about the human costs of war?
In May of this year, a professional polling company in the UK asked a representative sample of the public how many Iraqis (civilians and combatants combined) died because of the war than began in 2003. The poll was done two months after the 10 year anniversary of the war’s initiation which prompted a great deal of retrospective coverage in the media. Astoundingly, fifty nine percent answered that 10,000 or fewer Iraqis had died.
A credible answer would have been in the hundreds of thousands and it is possible that over a million Iraqis died because of the war.
The Iraqi government, working with the WHO, had a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in January of 2008 that estimated 151,000 deaths from violence alone by the end of June 2006. The study did not give an estimate for war related deaths from all causes. However, in March of 2008, the lead author of the NEJM study (Mohamed Ali), confirmed that 400,000 Iraqi deaths as of June 2006 can be calculated from that study’s data.
Another study published in the Lancet in 2006 estimated a death toll of 650,000 by the end of June 2006.
Of course, the war did not end in the middle of 2006. Iraq Body Count’s numbers (which only tallied reported deaths from war related violence and relied mainly on the media) would double between 2006 and the end of 2011. Similarly doubling the scientific estimates made for Iraqi deaths results in a death toll of 800,000-1,300,000.
The UK public was not any better informed than their counterparts in the USA. A poll done by AP in 2007 asked the US public to estimate the Iraqi civilian death toll from the war. The median answer was about 10,000.
Asked by Media Lens to comment on results of the ComRes poll in the UK, Noam Chomsky stated
‘Pretty shocking. I’m sure you’ve seen Sut Jhally’s study of estimates of Vietnam war deaths at the elite university where he teaches. Median 100,000, about 5% of the official figure, probably 2% of the actual figure. Astonishing – unless one bears in mind that for the US at least, many people don’t even have a clue where France is.
However, as I’m sure Chomsky would agree, ignorance driven merely by public indifference would lead to estimates all over the map. The results would not be completely skewed towards outrageous under estimates and one would expect a hefty percentage of respondents to say that they “don’t know” or to decline to guess. Only 0.3% of the ComRes poll respondents declined to guess or said they didn’t know. Only 2% gave estimates higher than one million. The results illustrate that the media systemically, and very successfully, buries the human cost of western initiated wars. The media’s response to the ComRes poll itself is further evidence of that. Media Lens pointed out
…the poll was simply ignored by both print and broadcast media. Our search of the Lexis media database found no mention in any UK newspaper, despite the fact that ComRes polls are deemed highly credible and frequently reported in the press.
It is a lot easier for western politicians and high profile pundits to beat their chests about their duty to protect Iraqis, Libyans (or now Syrians) by bombing them, when the death toll from previous wars is kept hidden. If not for the media induced ignorance, “humanitarian” warmongers would receive all the ridicule they deserve.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 8 days to add 460 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.