Skip to content Skip to footer
|

When Outsourcing Public Services to Private Companies Goes Wrong

(Photo: Washington State Dept of Transportation / Flickr)

The point of carpooling is to save some gas money while reducing traffic congestion and air pollution, but in Virginia, taxpayers could be on the hook when commuters try to do just that.

The Australian company Transurban recently teamed up with a construction firm to build new express toll lanes in a congested part of the Washington, DC-area beltway. Under a 40-year contract with Virginia, the state must reimburse the private companies up to 70 percent of toll revenues lost when the number of carpoolers in the express lanes exceeds 24 percent of the total traffic, making taxpayers foot the bill when carpooling cuts into contractor revenues.

It’s unclear if the carpooling rate will ever hit that mark. But whether they like it or not, Virginia taxpayers are stuck with the toll reimbursement deal for the next four decades, or until the firms post $100 million profit, according to In The Public Interest (ITPI), a policy group that examines government contracting. Voters can’t vote the consortium of private companies out of public service if carpooling becomes popular.

The Virginia carpooling toll deal is just one example on a list of “failures” that illustrate the problems that can arise when cash-strapped governments outsource public services to private companies that put profit before the public interest, according to a recent ITPI report.

Perhaps the most alarming outsourcing nightmare is the CityTime scandal in New York City. In 1998, the New York City contracted Science Applications International Corporation to modernize the payroll system that tracks the hours clocked by city workers. The project, known as CityTime, initially was projected to cost $63 million. But by 2010, the city had spent $700 million on the project.

New York City Comptroller John Lui, a Democrat who recently lost a bid for mayor amid a fundraising scandal, helped expose broad mismanagement and fraud in the CityTime project in 2010. Lui told reporters last week that the project was supposed to be a simple one if not a complete “boondoggle,” but because of mismanagement, lack of oversight of outside consultants, automatic contract extensions and outright fraud, CityTime ended being the most expensive outsourcing disaster in New York City history.

“The breadth and depth of what can go wrong when we hand over public services to for-profit corporations is staggering,” Lui told re porters last week.

Last year, Science Applications International Corporation, a defense contractor, agreed to pay $500 million back to the city to avoid federal prosecution, and eight people have been convicted in the CityTime scandal, including three computer programmers who were found guilty of defrauding the city of millions of dollars in November 2013.

“It’s hard to argue against transparency. It’s hard to argue against managing a contract well,” said ITPI Executive Director Donald Cohen, who told reporters his organization does not oppose outsourcing but pushes policies that would ensure that contracting and public services management is done well.

ITPI’s recent report, “Out of Control: The Coast-to-Coast Failures of Outsourcing Public Services to For-Profit Corporations,” details outsourcing failures that undermine transparency, accountability, “shared prosperity” and competition in the sphere of public services. Here are some highlights:

– In 2006, Indiana signed a lucrative contract with IBM to manage the state’s food stamp and Medicaid eligibility screenings. Thousands of low-income and elderly residents were dropped from the public service systems erroneously, including an Evansville man who died of heart problems in 2009, more than a year after being denied Medicaid benefits. His wife told Indiana lawmakers that he was denied Medicaid after repeatedly mailing in information requested by IBM. In another story that received media hype, a nun fighting cancer lost benefits after failing to call an eligibility hotline while being treated for congestive heart failure in the hospital. She tried several times to reschedule without success. In 2009, Indiana tried to end its working relationship with IBM amid the controversy, but a costly court battle over the contract continues today.

– An estimated 80 percent of the 5.4 million people working for federal contractors in 2008 earned less than a living wage for their city or region. Low-wage workers often rely on public assistance such as food stamps to make ends meet.

– A consortium of private companies holds a 99-year contract over a toll road in Denver. In 2008, the consortium objected to planned improvements for a free local road near the parkway, arguing that the contract prevents the city from maintaining roads that “might hurt the parkway financially” by providing an alternative route around the tolls.

As Truthout has pointed out in the past, private jail and prison contracts often include “occupancy quotas” that require state and local governments to maintain high occupancy levels in facilities or pay fees for empty beds. A recent report by ITPI found that 65 percent of for-profit state and local prison contracts include such quotas. Such contracts run counter to many states’ goals of reducing prison population and increasing inmate rehabilitation.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.