Following the recent uprising in Baltimore, Maryland Governor Larry Hogan promised that he’d work to reduce crime in the state. He also affirmed that Marylanders who’d been convicted of felonies and done their time should be able to reenter society as free citizens.
But the Republican governor still vetoed a measure that would have restored voting rights to felons who completed their sentences. Supporters are optimistic they have enough votes to override the governor’s veto, but for now that stroke of a pen keeps 40,000 formerly incarcerated Marylanders disenfranchised.
This kind of voting ban isn’t unique to Maryland. Indeed, the Brennan Center for Justice calculates that 35 states still disenfranchise people who are no longer in prison.
Virginia, where I live, is one of those states.
Before my incarceration for blowing the whistle on CIA torture, I voted in every election, casting my ballots for everything from county board on up to president. I don’t think it makes any sense for Richmond to deny me this right now that I’m no longer behind bars.
Nationwide, nearly 6 million Americans who paid their debt to society still aren’t permitted to vote. That’s one in every 40 adults.
Felon disenfranchisement is rooted in racist Jim Crow laws of the post-Civil War era. They were meant to keep former slaves, often convicted on trumped-up felony charges, from ever voting. The modern-day mass incarceration of black men on drug charges in particular has the same result – the disenfranchisement of an entire class of people.
Federal efforts to encourage states to allow ex-felons to vote have been bipartisan but ineffective.
The Democracy Restoration Act, introduced earlier this year, could re-enfranchise over 4 million people. But despite support from Maryland Democrat Ben Cardin and Kentucky Republican Rand Paul, the legislative tracking service GovTrack says the bill has no chance.
Fortunately, there’s more action at the state level.
Florida, for example, currently forces ex-felons to wait at least 16 years before petitioning to get their voting rights back. But in 2016, Floridians will vote on an initiative to erase the waiting period, which would allow all of the state’s 2 million ex-felons to register.
The Brennan Center proposes that any new law contain four elements to ensure that all citizens can vote.
First, all felons must be free to vote from the day they walk out of prison.
Second, all Americans facing criminal charges should be made to understand that they will lose their voting rights, but that those rights will be restored upon release from prison.
Third, states should mark felons as “inactive” voters while incarcerated, rather than striking them from voter rolls.
Finally, each state’s chief election officer should be mandated with informing other government agencies and the public about the law.
That sounds reasonable to me. After all, if a felon does his time but isn’t allowed a voice in his community, why would he become invested in it? What incentive does he have to establish roots and become a law-abiding citizen?
At least a dozen states allow felons to vote upon completion of their sentences. Maine and Vermont allow even incarcerated felons to vote. The skies haven’t fallen there.
Certainly, the rest of the country can enter the 21st century and re-enfranchise the millions of Americans who want to be productive members of society.
Now’s the time to get it done.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.