Skip to content Skip to footer

Pocan Urges McCarthy to Take Action as House Speaker Chides Pentagon Waste

Rep. Mark Pocan tweeted that Kevin McCarthy should “bring our 'Audit the Pentagon' bill to the floor."

Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy talks with reporters about the debt ceiling negotiations in the U.S. Capitol's Statuary Hall on May 24, 2023.

The Democratic co-chair of the Defense Spending Reduction Caucus challenged House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to act on his words after the Republican leader conceded Monday that there is wasteful spending at the Pentagon, which has never passed an independent audit.

“We need to get the efficiencies in the Pentagon,” McCarthy told CNN, criticizing GOP senators for seeking out ways to expand the military budget beyond the level set in the newly passed debt ceiling agreement.

“Think about it, $886 billion. You don’t think there’s waste? They failed the last five audits,” said McCarthy. “I consider myself a hawk, but I don’t want to waste money. So I think we’ve got to find efficiencies.”

The $886 billion figure McCarthy referenced is the military spending topline for fiscal year 2024 that House Republican leaders and the Biden administration agreed to as part of their deal to raise the debt limit.

That spending level, which still must be finalized in the appropriations process, is right in line with President Joe Biden’s budget request, which calls for a $28 billion increase over the current military budget of $858 billion.

McCarthy voted for that budget late last year even as critics condemned it as outrageously wasteful.

In response to McCarthy’s CNN interview, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) — who has been demanding cuts to Pentagon spending for years — tweeted that the Republican leader should finally “put his money where his mouth is and bring our ‘Audit the Pentagon’ bill to the floor.”

“There is plenty of waste and fraud at the Pentagon,” wrote Pocan, who co-chairs the Defense Spending Reduction Caucus alongside Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.).

The bipartisan Audit the Pentagon Act of 2023 would “administer a 0.5% cut to the budget of any office at the Pentagon that does not receive an audit for the first year of the bill’s enactment,” according to a summary of the legislation. That penalty would rise to 1% in subsequent years, exempting “funding for personnel, families, and military healthcare” from automatic cuts.

Of the bill’s 19 co-sponsors, eight are Republicans — though McCarthy is not one of them.

The speaker’s remarks Monday came as war hawks in the Senate Republican caucus continued to express dismay over the military spending level set in the debt limit deal, even though it would bring the Pentagon budget to a record high while cutting spending on education, housing programs, and other critical services.

Under the agreement, which drew applause from the CEO of one of the world’s leading weapons manufacturers, military outlays would account for nearly 56% of total discretionary spending. But that’s apparently not enough for Senate Republicans.

“We’re playing a dangerous game with our national security,” claimed Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). “The bill [McCarthy] produced is inadequate to the threats we face. If the Republican speaker takes the position that we’re going to be tough on China… I don’t see how we do that with a declining Navy.”

Graham and other Republican senators — along with Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Jack Reed (D-R.I.) — are “looking for creative ways to increase the Pentagon budget” beyond the $886 billion topline, Politico reported last week.

“The most likely vehicle is the next emergency supplemental for Ukraine, which they hope to cram with cash for other Pentagon priorities that normally wouldn’t be in the measure,” according to Politico. “But doing so could also mean a partisan clash if Democrats oppose reopening the deal through a supplemental without some relief for domestic spending priorities.”

The looming fight over Pentagon spending comes months after the Congressional Budget Office issued a report concluding that “the Department of Defense can’t accurately account for or report on its physical assets or spending.” The department has previously worked to cover up evidence of its massive waste, which is often a boon to arms makers.

Last month, a former top contract negotiator at the Pentagon told CBS News that “the gouging that takes place” at the Defense Department “is unconscionable,” with private companies dramatically overcharging the government for military equipment and other items.

Those comments led a group of senators, including Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), to demand a Pentagon investigation into price gouging by top government contractors such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon.

“The DOD can no longer expect Congress or the American taxpayer to underwrite record military spending while simultaneously failing to account for the hundreds of billions it hands out every year to spectacularly profitable private corporations,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter to the Pentagon chief.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.