New York State Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit Thursday against the National Rifle Association (NRA), stating that leaders of the organization engaged misused donations from members to fund their own personal expenditures for decades.
In the filing she made to the state’s Supreme Court, James alleged $64 million of funds were improperly spent by a number of executives with the non-profit pro-gun group, including by CEO Wayne LaPierre.
A statement from James’s office noted “a culture of self-dealing, mismanagement, and negligent oversight at the NRA that was illegal, oppressive, and fraudulent.” The attorney general called for the removal of LaPierre from his post, punitive actions against him and other officials at the NRA, and for the dissolution of the organization altogether.
James told reporters she was taking the extraordinary step of seeking to dissolve the organization “[b]ecause the corruption was so broad. And because of the level of waste. And because they have basically destroyed all of the assets of the operation.”
The New York Attorney General also said precedent allowed her to make such a request, including in 2018 when the Trump Foundation was dissolved after allegations came about that Trump had used the charity to fund his personal expenses.
The NRA issued a response regarding the lawsuit, alleging it was without merit.
“This was a baseless, premeditated attack on our organization and the Second Amendment freedoms it fights to defend,” the statement read. “You could have set your watch by it: the investigation was going to reach its crescendo as we move into the 2020 election cycle.”
James’s office, which began investigating the NRA in February of 2019, alleges that leaders of the group signed off on a number of financial reports they knew to be fraudulent, all while using funds from the organization’s coffers to benefit themselves and their friends.
The attorney general also noted that serious inquiries into the activities of the NRA in recent years were hampered due to the organization’s political influence.
“The NRA’s influence has been so powerful that the organization went unchecked for decades while top executives funneled millions into their own pockets,” James said.
Following the announcement of the lawsuit, President Donald Trump issued out a tweet alleging to his followers that the “Radical Left New York is trying to destroy the NRA.” Trump also warned that if he wasn’t reelected president, Americans’ “guns will be taken away, immediately and without notice.”
The political wing of the NRA spent tens of millions of dollars to support Trump’s election in 2016.
Viewpoints of the NRA have taken a significant dive in recent years, according to polling from Gallup. At its height in 2005, 60 percent of Americans had a favorable view of the organization, with only 34 percent expressing a negative opinion. In 2019, however, that favorable opinion dropped down to 48 percent, with 49 percent saying they had an unfavorable view of the NRA.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.