Three of the roughly 50 Venezuelan migrants who were flown to Martha’s Vineyard last week are suing Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, alleging that he deceived them with promises of food, shelter and job security and that his actions violated their rights.
Last week, DeSantis and other Florida officials coordinated a flight of migrants seeking asylum in the U.S. from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. The migrants were coerced into boarding the chartered plane by scouts at a migrant resource center, who assured them they would have jobs and shelter waiting for them in Washington D.C. or Boston upon arrival.
When the flight landed, however, migrants quickly discovered that jobs and shelter had not been arranged for them. Although DeSantis hadn’t warned Martha’s Vineyard residents that the flight would be arriving, community members rushed to help the migrants, providing them with food and shelter until they were relocated to a facility with further resources.
Three of those migrants are suing DeSantis and other officials, claiming that the stunt caused “economic, emotional, and constitutional harms” to them and their families, including their children.
“These immigrants, who are pursuing the proper channels for lawful immigration status in the United States, experienced cruelty akin to what they fled in their home country,” the lawsuit states.
The actions by the Florida governor and others were a “premeditated, fraudulent, and illegal scheme centered on exploiting” the migrants’ vulnerabilities to advance the “personal, financial and political interests” of DeSantis and his allies, the suit alleges.
DeSantis and the other defendants named in the lawsuit “manipulated [migrants], stripped them of their dignity, deprived them of their liberty, bodily autonomy, due process, and equal protection under law, and impermissibly interfered with the Federal Government’s exclusive control over immigration in furtherance of an unlawful goal and a personal political agenda,” the suit adds.
The lawsuit states that the migrants’ Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and their 14th Amendment due process rights were violated.
Officials representing DeSantis claim that consent forms signed by the migrants free him of any liability for harms they may have experienced. Taryn Fenske, a spokesperson for the governor, described the lawsuit as “political theater.”
The consent forms, which were released publicly by DeSantis, showcase that the governor’s defense may not hold up in court, however. The version of the form shared by journalist Judd Legum on Twitter includes three paragraphs in English, but only two of the paragraphs are translated into Spanish. The paragraph that wasn’t translated into Spanish includes information on the migrants’ final destination, but still only specifies that they would be going to “Massachusetts.”
The migrants’ lawsuit also acknowledges that they were given consent forms, but claims they were rushed into signing them and that they weren’t provided with proper translation services.
“DeSantis may have gotten the immigrants to sign consent forms — but if there was fraud (and it sounds like there was), then any purported contract was and is void,” said lawyer Tristan Snell on Twitter.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 7 days to add 432 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.