A proposed New Year’s Resolution: in 2015, let’s not punish the Palestinians for joining the International Criminal Court.
No doubt some members of Congress – presumably, the ones who aren’t busy resigning for felony tax evasion or defending themselves for schmoozing with white supremacists – will try to gin up an outrage festival and demand sanctions on the Palestinians for exercising their rights.
“Ring out the old, bring in the new.” Let’s ignore these voices. Let’s see if we can find 10 conscientious members of Congress who are willing to say, “Actually, the Palestinians have the right to do this if they want, and they shouldn’t be punished for signing up for the rule of law.”
It’s kind of funny, in a not ha-ha way, how twisted the public discourse in the United States is, that we even have to defend the proposition that the Palestinians should join the ICC if they want.
But we do.
Exhibit A: this New York Times editorial, slamming Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for applying for Palestine to join the ICC.
The “liberal” New York Times editors concede that “prospects for a two-state solution grow dimmer by the day, with . . . the Israeli government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, steadily expanding settlements, making the creation of a viable Palestinian state harder,” and that “in joining the International Criminal Court . . . the Palestinians could bring charges against Israeli officials for cases against their settlement activities.” But then – in complete contradiction to that which they just conceded – they claim that “Abbas’ actions will almost certainly make the situation worse, setting back the cause of statehood even farther.”
Sadly, like still-too-many American liberals, the New York Times editors claim to oppose Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank, but object far more strenuously to anyone actually trying to do anything concrete to stop it.
Is it any wonder that “prospects for a two-state solution grow dimmer by the day,” when the purported tribunes of American liberalism oppose any practical and concrete measure to try to save it?
Fortunately, in 2015, we don’t need to rely on the “liberal” New York Times to defend the basic principles of decency and fair play. We can do it ourselves. You can write to Congress and the president here.
Help Truthout resist the new McCarthyism
The Trump administration is cracking down on political dissent. Under pressure from an array of McCarthy-style tactics, academics, activists and nonprofits face significant threats for speaking out or organizing in resistance.
Truthout is appealing for your support to weather this storm of censorship. We’ve launched a fundraising campaign to find 232 new monthly donors in the next 24 hours. Will you be one?
As independent media with no corporate backing or billionaire ownership, Truthout is uniquely able to push back against the right-wing narrative and expose the shocking extent of political repression under the new McCarthyism. We’re committed to doing this work, but we’re also deeply vulnerable to Trump’s attacks.
Your support during our fundraiser (24 hours left!) will help us continue our nonprofit movement journalism in the face of right-wing authoritarianism. Please make a tax-deductible donation today.