Missouri will be unable to implement a key provision of federal health care law, Gov. Jay Nixon announced Thursday.
Meantime, Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback says he won’t support an application from Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger to establish a state-federal health insurance marketplace.
That means it will be up to the federal government to establish health insurance exchanges in Missouri and Kansas. The exchanges are designed to be online marketplaces where individuals and small businesses can compare and buy private insurance plans.
As part of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, the states face a Nov. 16 deadline to notify the federal government if they want to run their own insurance exchange. They must be open for business by 2014. When states do not open their own, the federal government will step in and set up an exchange.
“I think it’s a duty best handled by the state,” Nixon said, later adding: “But a state-based option is not on the table at this time.”
This week, voters approved a ballot measure prohibiting the governor from establishing an exchange without the involvement of the General Assembly. The Democratic governor said that because of the constraints of that measure, and reluctance of Republican legislative leaders, the only option left is to tell the federal government Missouri will be unable to proceed with a state-based exchange.
A bill creating the “Show Me Health Insurance Exchange” cleared the Missouri House last year with unanimous support. The measure died in the state Senate, however, after several senators expressed concerns. It was never brought up during the most recent legislative session, and House leadership expressed little enthusiasm for the idea following the 2012 elections.
Brownback’s decision, announced Thursday, illustrates the divide over the federal health care law between the conservative Republican governor and the moderate Republican Praeger.
Praeger, who is an elected commissioner, had been working on a grant application to seek a state-federal partnership to manage the exchange in Kansas. Brownback had to sign a letter of support before the application could be filed with federal officials.
“Obamacare,” Brownback said in a news release, “is an overreach by Washington and (Kansans) have rejected the state’s participation. … We will not benefit from it and implementing it could cost Kansas taxpayers millions of dollars.”
Unlike mainstream media, we’re not capitulating to Trump.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.