Chicago – Rod R. Blagojevich, the former governor of Illinois who tried to sell President Obama’s Senate seat, has waited three months to learn his fate after being convicted on multiple corruption charges. Now he will have to wait longer.
This week, Judge James Zagel of United States District Court indefinitely delayed Mr. Blagojevich’s sentencing, which had been set for Oct. 6. He offered no explanation. Representatives for Mr. Blagojevich could not be reached for comment.
One possible reason for the delay is that next week Judge Zagel is to begin overseeing the trial of a co-defendant in the sweeping federal investigation against Mr. Blagojevich and others. The co-defendant, the businessman William Cellini, who faces extortion charges, was a lobbyist and fund-raiser for the governor. In June, Mr. Blagojevich was convicted on 17 counts of wire fraud, attempted extortion, soliciting bribes, conspiracy to commit extortion and conspiracy to solicit and accept bribes. Legal experts say he could be sentenced to decades in prison.
For now, Mr. Blagojevich is busy fending off a state agency that has moved to suspend his law license, beginning a process that could lead to disbarment. An Illinois Supreme Court petition filed by the state Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, which regulates lawyers, accused the ex-governor in late August of “moral turpitude” and asked the court to prevent him from practicing law as he awaits his sentencing. Mr. Blagojevich’s legal team has until next month to convince the court that his license should not be suspended.
Mr. Blagojevich, a self-professed C student at Pepperdine University’s law school, became a lawyer in 1984 and practiced for more than a decade before taking an “inactive” status in 2000. He was elected governor of Illinois in 2002 and re-elected in 2006. He was arrested in late 2008.
If his license is suspended, Mr. Blagojevich will be unable to reactivate it until a disbarment investigation is completed. The loss of his license would eliminate an income option for the former governor, who has said he is short on cash and has appeared in commercials for pistachios to make money.
Still, aside from a short period in early 2010 when Mr. Blagojevich temporarily reactivated his lawyer status, he has not shown any intention of returning to the legal profession.
According to court documents, Mr. Blagojevich’s lawyer sent a letter to the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission asking that his name be “withdrawn” as a licensed lawyer in Illinois. His request was rejected, and the agency sent him forms to file for disbarment, according to James J. Grogan, deputy administrator and chief counsel for the agency.
“There’s a protocol to follow,” Mr. Grogan said.
Disbarring himself would require Mr. Blagojevich to admit guilt before sentencing begins.
A felony conviction in Illinois does not result in an automatic disbarment, though it is common, Mr. Grogan said. His agency, however, cannot pursue legally disbarring Mr. Blagojevich until after he is sentenced and a full disbarment investigation is conducted.
“That could take years,” Mr. Grogan said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.