Mexico City â In lieu of signing a treaty to curb global warming, the European Union says it will push instead for âconcrete and ambitious resultsâ in six specific sectors at the COP16 meeting beginning next month in CancĂșn.
Regional environmental groups, however, have set the bar much lower, citing disillusionment after last yearâs failed talks in Copenhagen.
Marie-Anne Coninsx, head of the EUâs delegation to Mexico, said on Oct. 12 that parties in CancĂșn must establish solid advances in technology cooperation; international financing; mitigating and adapting to climate change; MRV (measurement, reporting and verification); global carbon markets; and tropical deforestation.
The ambassador outlined the agenda at a press conference for local media ahead of a global press event on Oct. 25-26 in Brussels that EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard and UN Climate Chief Christina Figueres are expected to attend.
âWe must have concrete results in all of these sectorsâŠto move forward with a binding global treaty at the COP17 in South Africa. If not, the âbalanced package of decisionsâ will be unbalanced,â she said, referring to a term used by Hedegaard earlier this week to describe key priorities for the CancĂșn summit.
âIt is essential that all participating countries present binding commitments in not just one but all of these fields,â Coninsx said. âEurope is prepared to make ambitious and concrete accords in CancĂșn. We hope that other nations are as well.
âYes we CancĂșn,â Coninsx added.
Low Expectations
But Gustavo AranĂs, president of the Mexican Center for Environmental Law (CEMDA), told SolveClimate News that while he hoped nations would forge a comprehensive legal agreement at the COP16 summit, the EUâs goals were overly ambitious.
Click here to sign up for Truthoutâs FREE daily email updates.
CEMDA participated in panels in China last week for the Washington-based Climate Action Network (CAN) International. âAfter the meetings in Tianjin, we realized that negotiations are moving too slowly, and that weâre not reaching any kinds of agreements,â he said.
âAt the end of the day, countries have not demonstrated sufficient political will to establish commitmentsâ to policies on these six sectors, AranĂs said. âWeâre still in an early stage of promoting dialogue and rebuilding confidence following disillusionment at Copenhagen.â
Kelly Blynn, coordinator for the nonprofit group 350.orgâs campaign in Latin America and the Caribbean, said many environmental organizations have low expectations for the summit. Blynn anticipated few major advances this year, forecasting the most progress in international financing and the REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) program.
Isaac Valero LadrĂłn, the Mexico delegationâs climate change adviser, said that the lack of success in Copenhagen last year drove the EU to work with nations to establish individual policies before confronting the global negotiations.
He pointed to EU demands that industrialized nations present clear and concrete data to measure the reduction in their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, calling it an issue of âtransparency,â and follow through on their commitments to fast-track financing, the $30 billion pledge made by rich countries to support developing nations in climate change efforts.
Valero LadrĂłn suggested the EU would succeed in convincing wealthy countries to act on climate change by highlighting economic self-interest. âThis is key for industrialized nations: to present it not as a challenge, but as an opportunity to transform their economies,â he said.
In 2008, for example, GHG emissions among the first 15 EU member states to sign the Kyoto Protocol dropped 6.9 percent from 1990 levels, while the economy grew 45 percent during the same period, according to E.U. data.
EU Efforts in Latin America
CEMDAâs AranĂs noted the EUâs positive efforts in Latin America, especially in knowledge transfer. âThe EU could play an even bigger role in transferring technologyâ for renewable energy and public transportation systems, AranĂs said.
Responding to rumors that the Kyoto Protocol might be axed in CancĂșn, Valero LadrĂłn said, âThe Protocol is the most advanced line that we have in climate change negotiationsâŠ.We donât consider it to be the most adequate instrument, but we donât want to kill it either.â
Instead, he added, itâs most likely that the EUâs proposal to extend the global climate treaty, which imposes emission limits on industrialized nations, from 2012 to 2013 will pass.
For Blynn, the EU is a progressive force for climate change policies in developing nations, but she has doubts about its potential impact this year. âItâs doing far more domestically than the United States and most countries, but thereâs still the question of, How much power do they really have within the negotiations?â she asked. âI feel that after the Copenhagen Accord [was drafted], the EU was sidelined in that whole process.
âThis year, the question is what role the EU will play, and how they will push beyond the very low expectationsâ for the summit, Blynn said.
We have 10 days to raise $50,000 â weâre counting on your support!
For those who care about justice, liberation and even the very survival of our species, we must remember our power to take action.
We wonât pretend itâs the only thing you can or should do, but one small step is to pitch in to support Truthout â as one of the last remaining truly independent, nonprofit, reader-funded news platforms, your gift will help keep the facts flowing freely.