Skip to content Skip to footer

Immigrant Advocates Are Worried About Threats to Due Process in New Biden Policy

The Biden administration has announced a “dedicated docket” process that advocates warn could harm asylum seekers.

Migrants attempting to cross in to the U.S. from Mexico are detained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at the border on May 21, 2021, in San Luis, Arizona.

After the Biden administration on Friday announced a “dedicated docket” process that aims to “more expeditiously and fairly make decisions in immigration cases of families who arrive between ports of entry at the southwest border,” migrant rights advocates and experts expressed alarm that the changes could negatively impact asylum-seekers.

President Joe Biden campaigned on a promise to dramatically shift away from immigration policies of former President Donald Trump that were widely denounced as cruel. Human rights defenders have urged Biden to enable fair and timely asylum hearings, while avoiding the “rocket dockets” of the Obama and Trump administrations that critics say eroded due process, exacerbated backlogs, limited access to counsel, resulted in high rates of in absentia removals, and ultimately endangered lives.

Under previous administrations, “families were quickly rushed through proceedings without a fair chance to seek protection,” explained Ursela Ojeda of the Migrant Rights and Justice program at Women’s Refugee Commission (WRC) in a statement Friday. “As a result, many were ordered deported without ever having the chance to meaningfully make their case to an immigration judge.”

“While we encourage the Biden administration to continue efforts to expand access to legal orientations,” Ojeda said, “we are concerned that these families will be unnecessarily placed on electronic surveillance and subjected to a shortened timeline that risks undermining meaningful due process within the highly politicized and subjective immigration court system.”

“Although the decision suggests some flexibility so that ‘fairness will not be compromised,'” she added, “WRC is deeply concerned that the suggested time constraints, lack of guaranteed counsel, and meaningful community-based case support could set families up to fail.”

The Biden administration’s dedicated docket announcement came Friday in a joint statement from Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Attorney General Merrick Garland, as BuzzFeed News reported on government documents it obtained detailing plans to reshape how asylum-seekers are processed.

“Families arriving at the border who are placed in immigration proceedings should have their cases decided in an orderly, efficient, and fair manner,” said Mayorkas. “Families who have recently arrived should not languish in a multi-year backlog; today’s announcement is an important step for both justice and border security.”

Garland said that “the mission of the Department of Justice’s immigration courts is to decide the cases that come before them promptly and fairly” and “this new program for certain newly arriving families will help achieve that critically important goal.”

However, as César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, a law professor at Ohio State University, told The Hill:

Legal processing doesn’t happen in a vacuum so I have two concerns. One, are you going to be shortcutting anywhere that is going to have detrimental impact on the claims that people who are on this special docket receive? Because they’re not going to have enough time to find lawyers, to build up their legal cases. It just takes time to do that, and then you’re shortchanging the quality of justice meted out…

And the second part is about the people whose cases get displaced because court resources are being redistributed… Are those people just being pushed to the back of the line and having to wait interminable amounts of time before they find out what their future looks like?

Eleanor Acer, senior director for refugee protection at Human Rights First, echoed warnings that “while measures that both reduce delays for asylum-seekers and strengthen due process would be a step in the right direction, creating ‘dedicated dockets’ for families seeking asylum may amount to another round of ‘rocket dockets’ that short circuit due process and aggravate backlogs.”

“Noticeably missing from the administration’s announcement is any mention of when they will undo Trump policies that deny asylum to victims of deadly gangs and domestic violence,” Acer added. “The announcement is also glaringly silent on the Biden administration’s continued use of the Trump administration Title 42 policy that expels asylum-seekers to danger, and makes no mention of restarting asylum hearings for people who remain waiting and blocked from seeking asylum at U.S. ports of entry.”

National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) executive director Mary Meg McCarthy similarly called out the current administration for forcing asylum-seeking families to go through expedited court proceedings “that will rob them of basic due process protections, including the opportunity to obtain adequate legal counsel or to fully prepare their cases,” and warned against a return to “failed” policies.

“A rocket docket that moves people too quickly through this flawed system is the opposite of justice,” said McCarthy. “Instead of moving to expedite cases without guarantee of counsel and injecting further chaos into the overburdened immigration courts, the administration must build an appointed counsel program and quickly focus its attention on urgent deficiencies in the asylum and immigration court systems.”

The Center for Gender & Refugee Studies (CGRS) at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law concurred: “Instead of reviving the failed policies of past administrations, the Biden administration should swiftly end cruel and illegal Trump-era policies and fully restore safe asylum processing at the southern border.”

The center highlighted that despite the president’s campaign promises, “families seeking asylum face enormous roadblocks to safety and justice,” pointing to the Title 42 policy and that the Biden administration “has yet to address Trump policies that have gutted protections for people escaping domestic violence and gang brutality.”

“CGRS and our partners have set forth a clear roadmap for the Biden administration to adjudicate asylum cases in a timely manner and mitigate backlogs, all while improving fairness and protecting due process,” said the center’s legal director, Blaine Bookey. “As advocates, we’ve been down this road before. We know policies that rush asylum adjudications fail to keep families and children safe. We implore the administration not to make the mistake of putting speed above justice.”

WRC’s Ojeda encouraged the Biden administration to “immediately end the use of summary expulsions under the guise of the pandemic and rescind Trump-era asylum case law decisions that will wreak havoc for anyone who manages to access the asylum process, including those under today’s announcement.”

“Families and individuals seeking refuge cannot wait a minute longer,” she said. “WRC urges the Biden administration to implement policies that ensure all families and adults who arrive at the U.S.-Mexico border can seek asylum and have their cases be fairly decided. It is time to restart asylum and welcome with dignity, once and for all.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.